• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (5)
  •  

Picking a Royal

Published on January 14, 2013
Published on January 14, 2013
Topics :
Government House , Newfoundland and Labrador , England , America

The political system of parliamentary democracy with constitutional monarchy which developed in England over centuries is one that has served many nations well. Attempts to replace it with something better have generally been failures; I doubt that sensible people would argue that, for instance, America has a better system.

The office of the lieutenant-governor is part of our system which has served us well in Newfoundland.

I feel strongly that it ought to be maintained. But I would go further — and perhaps make myself a minority of one.

I would like to see a member of the Royal family appointed as the next lieutenant-governor. The politicians that have been appointed to the position have generally been too much associated with parties and events to be respected by all. Academics have been too obscure to mean much to the general population.

When Prince Edward was in Newfoundland, he was surprisingly popular, especially with young people. A youthful prince or duke in Government House would make the office of lieutenant-governor, and Newfoundland and Labrador as a whole, much more exciting and romantic both to residents and the outside world.

And never mind those who are against the office of the lieutenant-governor and the monarchy. They are just against; they don’t have any ideas that would truly lead to better government and a happier Newfoundland and Labrador.

Randy Lieb-Warmsworth

Ramea

Comments

  • Username
    david
    - January 14, 2013 at 17:46:08

    Favorite Royal? Frank 'Danky' Dorrington.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Doug Smith
    - January 14, 2013 at 16:46:54

    Mr. Lieb-Warmsworth, in your letter you stated that the office of the lieutenant-governor, “…has served us well in Newfoundland.” Could you give some examples to support this assertion? Actually, the offices of both governor-general and lieutenant-governor are an insult to all who believe in democracy and freedom, that’s why the Americans got rid of the monarchy. There is nothing special about, “royalty” or the current “royals” they just happened to be born into the family. The history of royalty is one of oppression of the common people so I don’t understand why anyone would think the present day heirs of tyrants deserve special treatment of some kind. I know there is a certain amount of snob appeal regarding royalty but truthfully they are just leeches. Doug Smith, GFW

    Submit a comment

    • Username
      PETER L
      - January 15, 2013 at 13:03:13

      Doug Smith, did you know that the Warmsworth name was a bought British title? Randy Lieb bought it some years ago, titles can be bought, and not too expensive obviously. I agree, time to do away with the role, it really serves no purpose, it's a great expense, and that piece of property the government house can be sold for public good. This is why Randy wants it kept, he feels he is a part of it due to his new title. However it's time we distanced ourselves from "Royalty" and the expense of it. As well, the only attempts to have it done away with and replaced that have failed are third world countries. Others have done away with it, like the USA, and have done quite well. It's old, it's dated, it's stale and it's expensive, just abolish it, it will have no negative effects in this country, but many positive ones. Royalty can still visit if they wish, the youth can ogle them, but we won't be paying for it anymore when it is gone.

  • Username
    saelcove
    - January 14, 2013 at 11:47:51

    One word British Monarchy leeches

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Don II
    - January 14, 2013 at 11:09:41

    The modern day British Monarchy is run like a Corporation which has command of the media and is putting out effective propaganda to elevate it members in a popularity contest. If the people of Newfoundland and Labrador had been provided with a factual history of the British Monarchy and the Royal Family and could see for themselves the amount of unethical, corrupt and high handed abuses of power such as improper executions, wars of conquest and colonialism, seizures of land and estates without reason or compensation and murderous abuses that took place in Colonial America, Ireland, India and even in Newfoundland and Labrador itself that the British Monarchy is responsible for they should have no desire to be ruled by these people or their appointed flunkies! The fact that Canada has not abolished its ties to the British Monarchy and continues to refuse to declare itself to be a free and independent Republic is astonishing!

    Submit a comment

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts
loading...

Tely Twitter

Advertising