Customize your website

Where's the controversy?



Published on September 7th, 2010
Published on September 7th, 2010
 
Topics :
Canada

There have been hundreds of Canadians who have been diagnosed with an abnormal condition called chronic cerebro-spinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI) in their neck, which is basically a narrowing of the veins.

This abnormal condition impedes the blood flow from the brain to the heart and is not a healthy situation under any circumstances. Treatment is a simple angioplasty and, in some cases, a stent must be inserted.

This treatment has been government approved and performed successfully in Canada by vascular surgeons since the 1980s and would be covered under current provincial health-care systems, for most people.

Unfortunately, there are those whom the government(s) wish to exclude because they also have a condition known as multiple sclerosis.

Treatment for CCSVI cannot be authorized for those with MS. The news media is constantly referring to the treatment as a ‘“controversial treatment for MS.” It may be a controversial treatment for MS, but not for CCSVI.

Those with CCSVI wish to have only their CCSVI treated based on its own merits.  So, where is the controversy? All that we see here is a severe case of discrimination. 

Oh Canada, how have you allowed this issue to get so clouded?  Certain elected officials of both levels of government  did not complete their homework and allowed  themselves to be so quickly influenced by a small, biased, narrow-minded group  of  individuals.

If one has narrowed veins in the neck, one should have the right to have them treated in Canada by our own qualified vascular surgeons. CCSVI patients are still forced to travel outside of Canada, at great personal expense, to seek this simple treatment. This is absolutely disgusting. 

Cal Westover

Newmarket, Ont.

Comments

  • Username
    Eugene from Town
    - September 7th, 2010 at 09:17:57

    Like switching from petro products to more sustainable, less polluting, sources of energy, there seems to be a great inertia in our medical establishments (ie. governmental groups, special interest charities) to actually implement cures. Seems that the MS Society (unlike former N&L head of that organizationTed Warren) is reluctant to support its own demise by calling for trials and then use of the Zamboni treatment.

    Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

This form is NOT used for emailing the article to a friend. Please use the "Send to a friend" link at the top of the page for that purpose.

The Telegram is not responsible for posted comments. Please be polite and confine your comments to the subject of the posted story. If you have an account, please sign on to it..

(we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts
loading...

Tely Twitter

Advertising