• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (8)
  •  

Mining chairman owes province an apology

Published on June 13, 2012
Published on June 13, 2012
Topics :
Quebec Hydro , Hydro-Québec , Muskrat , Newfoundland and Labrador , Quebec

I would like to congratulate the shareholder who had the guts to criticize Mark Morabito, executive chairman of Alderon, for his political remarks on Muskrat Falls at their annual meeting on June 4.

What Mr. Morabito was reported to have said is that “power definitely is the biggest issue for us and the proposed Muskrat Falls hydroelectric project is crucial to the company’s $989-million Kamistiatusset project.”

Muskrat Falls is the most sensitive political issue in the province today and to interfere in this manner is incomprehensible. It was a threat, no other words to describe it, and an insult to the people of this province and he should withdraw his remarks and apologize.

He also gave the impression that Muskrat Falls was the only source of power that Alderon can access.

Let me enlighten Mr. Morabito: in 1998, Newfoundland and Labrador signed a deal with Quebec Hydro for recall rights on 300 megawatts of the power generated at the Upper Churchill project at the same price as we agreed to sell power to them in 1969. (To my knowledge, Quebec was under no obligation to make this offer.)

Let me quote the agreement with Quebec Hydro: “Only energy surplus to the province’s own needs would be exported out of the province. NL Hydro priority will be to continue local and domestic needs within Labrador.” As we could only use 170 megawatts in Labrador, the other 130 megawatts could not be sold.

On April 2, 2009, former premier Danny Williams announced details of a “historic agreement” to sell electricity directly through the Quebec power grid and into the United States. He told reporters he understood that the power is now being sold into the New York area through Emera Energy Inc.

So, contrary to the widely held belief that Hydro-Québec refuses to allow us to use their power grid, we have been using the grid since 2009.

Now let me pose the following questions to Mr. Morabito:

• How many megawatts of power do you require for this mining project?

• Availability of power is one consideration, but another is price. Do you have an agreement to purchase your power from the Muskrat project and at what price?

• As stated earlier, Labrador needs have to be addressed before we can export all or any part of the surplus 130 megawatts. Does the present agreement with the United States purchaser include a clause that the power can be recalled when you are ready to use it?

• You gave the impression that the only source of power available to you was from Muskrat Falls. Have you entered into any discussions with Hydro-Québec to obtain a quotation for your power needs? If so, what price did they offer you?

I look forward to hearing what Mr. Morabito has to say on these questions.

Burford Ploughman

St. John’s

Comments

  • Username
    Maurice E. Adams
    - June 13, 2012 at 15:27:12

    Thank you VIRGINIA WATERS (and thank you to others as well who have also thanked me for trying to convey the best I can what I have been able to glean from Nalcor's complex web/house of cards)........... The $14.5 billion I extracted from Nalcor's 2011 "Technical Briefing to the Media". The numbers used are the DG2 (not DG3) numbers and I just added up the debt servicing and operating costs extracted from one of their graphs......... The number used in the graph may be in constant dollars, but not sure, and that may account for the difference......... Another reason is, if you are calculating the debt repayment for the dam over 57 years, where I think the plan is to repay that portion over 30 (not 57) years.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    William Daniels
    - June 13, 2012 at 15:10:59

    I think there should be an inquiry into Mr. William's so called business deals since he has left politics. Lest We Forget the truth.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Virginia Waters
    - June 13, 2012 at 14:26:32

    Keep up the great work Maurice. You keep Dunderdale, Kennedy, Martin and (aka) Smith awake nights concocting new arguments for this insane project. But I have a question. How did you come up with the $14.5 billion? That seems to be low-balling it, especially if you're using the new estimate of $8 billion. Maybe you're deducting for the planned Emera investment or some upfront cash investment by the province. My guesstimate is that, based on a 57 year amortization, we'd have to pretty well multiply the financed portion by a factor of three. If so, that would probably mean that the province's entire stream of royalties and taxes over the life of the Hebron project would be consumed on this one project. I don't mind seeing some of our oil revenues being spent to improve the productivity and competitiveness of our renewable resource sector, but the notion that we should use those one-time gains to subsidize another non-renewable industry - mining - is absolutely irresponsible. I wholeheartedly agree with those who say this cannot be done without a referendum - and if a referendum is held, I have no doubt whatsoever it will be thumbs down from the electorate.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Maurice E. Adams
    - June 13, 2012 at 12:49:29

    Over 50 years, and excluding cost overruns and interest during construction, Muskrat Falls costs $14.5 BILLION ($6 BILLION of which occurs AFTER 2041).

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Brian
    - June 13, 2012 at 11:53:12

    Morabito's main consultant is Brian Tobin's number one man. It's a nice little club they have there, Tobin and Williams and the nameless consultant.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Cold Future
    - June 13, 2012 at 09:00:11

    Big business will always be looking for handouts. It has been the norm in NL especially and Kruger is the latest prime example. The Kruger timing is spot on. Government and Nalcor need the mill in operation desperately until the Muskrat has reached the stage of "can't turn back no matter how bad the deal is". Alderon though is looking for the handout before it is even in business. It could very well work for them if it can be done before the next provincial election.Guess it will all play out in the transparency of time.

    Submit a comment

    • Username
      Cold present
      - June 13, 2012 at 10:29:10

      It's Newfoundland, everyone is looking for a handout.

    • Username
      Alex
      - June 13, 2012 at 10:53:26

      ...ecxept you, of course.

    • Username
      Alex
      - June 13, 2012 at 13:55:48

      I was kind of hoping to see Mac Barfoot and Brandi Disterheft. *sigh*

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts
loading...

Tely Twitter

Advertising