• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (2)
  •  

Dealing with a secretive Executive Council

Published on June 29, 2012
Published on June 29, 2012
Topics :
Executive Council , Supreme Court

Russell Wangersky’s column of June 12, entitled “You’ll know only what they want you to know,” regarding the public’s restricted access to provincial government documents, rang a very loud warning bell of alarm, and a disturbing recall, for me.  

The column spoke of the near-paranoidal fear and lament of our provincial government’s executive council related to the question of public access to sensitive government documents — the council’s fear that it might lose some of the most restrictive, secretive, drop-dead confidential decision-making powers, from my perspective, on this planet.

The flashback, for me, involved a $2,200 retro-pay concern, and a most egregious, selfish, obstructive abuse of power on the part of some very senior public servants in the premier’s office, department directors, an assistant deputy minister, a deputy minister and the inaccessible backroom Executive Council — the latter, perhaps the most secretive, dismissive, callous entity on the face of the Earth.  

The only recourse should you wish to challenge a decision of that body is through the Supreme Court, and you best be “lawyered up,” as they say.

There came a point in the end, after nine years of constantly seeking redress, whereby I could not believe that a group of elected, mature, well-educated people, i.e. members of the Executive Council, could not understand the miscarriage of justice in my case. I simply refused to accept that the simple facts of the case could just be dismissed, denied.

I did not trust the decisions being made, given the clear evidence and the facts of the matter. Before finally giving up, and after some serious thought, I decided to contact the members of the Executive Council (cabinet members) personally. Each Monday morning, I would email each cabinet member, including the premier, minister of finance, etc., a page of the saga, something which would have gone on for about a year.

It took only four instalments, by my recall, when a call was made to me and a cheque for $2,200 was passed to me in a plain white envelope by a staff person unknown to me.  

I am convinced that cabinet members are not always fully briefed on matters before they vote. Never give up. Reread Russell Wangersky’s column.

 

Ronald Tizzard

Paradise

Comments

  • Username
    William Daniels
    - June 30, 2012 at 11:54:29

    Well said Mr. Tizzard. The secrecy of this government started with Danny Williams and continues to this day. Put that in your "purple file" Princess.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Frank M
    - June 29, 2012 at 13:02:24

    The secrecy and agenda of the Executive Council are not unique to this government. It's an exclusive little club whose members are referred to as the old Guard in publications by Doug House and Bill Rowe, among others. Its power is almost perverse.

    Submit a comment

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts
loading...

Tely Twitter

Advertising