• 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Thanks for voting!

Top of page

Comments

Comments

Recent comments

  • Petertwo
    November 07, 2012 - 05:35

    David, pharmacists depend on their clients having money, not the government. What subsidies? Rural areas are slowly dying where is a monopoly when there is little business to be had? Maybe you know something that I do'nt, explain please.

    • david
      November 07, 2012 - 07:38

      "....government has enacted policies that will carve out tens of millions of dollars from our businesses...." As vague and unsubstantiated as that statement is, this letter certainly does not promote any misguided impression that the filling of medical prescriptions is anything at all like an open, free-market dealing between willing buyers and sellers....so how is it that you are so ignorant of that? And as far as rural Newfoundland "dying" goes, I hardly think that protecting and subsidizing pharmacists more is a sensible , useful or relevant course of action. If there isn't enough business to run a monopoly health care business somewhere, then guess what...?!

  • a business man
    November 06, 2012 - 16:37

    I had no idea about this change, but I am certainly happy about this. I have businesses and rental properties in St. John's and this decision gives me 35 more potential customers. Whether or not they actually patronize my establishment(s) is not up to me, but I am happy that there is a chance that I might make more money as a result of this change. If those jobs were in rural NL, I would not see any benefit. SO regardless of the unemployment in rural NL, I fully support this government intitative.

  • David
    November 06, 2012 - 14:52

    A rural pharmacy is most often a monopoly situation, and therefore a very low-risk license to print money in the uber-profitable, government-funded health care orgy...err sector. Be happy with what you got. Darryl.