More to worry about on roads than moose

Send to a friend

Send this article to a friend.

Having occasion to travel between Twillingate and St. John’s every New Year’s, I never fail to observe the highway sign on the Trans-Canada Highway that gives the number of highway fatalities during the course of the year.

Last year the number was 33 and this year the sign said 26. Not counting the two individuals who tragically lost their lives recently on the Northern Peninsula Highway, approximately 60 individuals have lost their lives on our highways during the past 24 months.

Like any parent and grandparent, it is a source of great concern and worry for me any time that my children and grandkids are travelling on our highways, as I am acutely aware of the great risk presented by a variety of potential road hazards.

I am concerned, however, that the vast majority of expressions of concern to the various media involves only the hazard presented by moose on the highway.

A stranger to our province, listening to the open-line shows, would very quickly come to adopt an opinion that there were moose on every turn and that the majority of tragic accidents are caused by moose on the roadways. In actual fact, by focusing exclusively on the potential for a moose accident, those individuals who purport to be attempting to save our motoring public from harm may actually be diverting attention away from other factors that in effect result in over 95 per cent of fatalities on the highways.

In fact, as tragic as they are for the families concerned, my research leads me to conclude that fatalities involving moose collisions accounted for less than five per cent of highways deaths over the past two years, yet generated perhaps 95 per cent of discussion on the open line shows concerning the hazards facing drivers.

As a moose hunter and one who values our great wildlife resources, it pains me to see the provincial government basing their moose licencing policies on the number of disparaging calls to the open-line shows labelling the magnificent moose as nuisances that, in fact, have no right to exist on the island, not being native to Newfoundland. Last time I checked, we were not native to  this island either, and I for one do not want to add to our disgraceful legacy of exterminating things that bother us in the least by eliminating this great wildlife resource.

In fact, there are many things we can do, as drivers, to lessen our chances of a moose/vehicle collision, and it is about time that the discussion turned to other things that put our children at risk, such as drivers whose tires resemble bologna skins or those who speed along when three inches of slush covers the roadway as if it were a sunny day in August.

As for moose, I want my grandchildren to have the opportunity to live in a province rich with wildlife — a source of food, both for the body and the soul.


David Boyd writes from Twillingate.



Organizations: Trans-Canada Highway

Geographic location: Twillingate, Newfoundland, August.As

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Thanks for voting!

Top of page



Recent comments

  • david
    January 09, 2013 - 10:43

    Mosse have lived here for 100 years. We've been driving on the highway, a narrow, dangerous one, for 50 of those those years. But only in the past decade....pretty much since oil oil lucre came ashore.....did it become intolerable to have these murderous wildebeasts roam among us. Newfoundland: turning a once-in-an-eternity financial legacy into trinkets, ill-conceived causes du jour, monuments to giant political egos, white elephants, outright waste, and pirate plunder.

  • Frank
    January 09, 2013 - 10:38

    A well written and reasoned article devoid of all the rhetoric and fear mongering that is the trademark of Sopac and especially Eugene Nippard. People are dying on our highways at an alarming rate and the accident rate is increasing because of increased traffic and driver inattention and Sopac seems oblivious to the carnage. But if you listen to Open Line you would swear that the moose are out there hunting humans. Wildlife is something to be cherished not seem as a nuisance.

  • mom
    January 09, 2013 - 10:02

    I have to agree with your article. There are far too many people who don't drive to suit the road conditions. It is time to look at the other causes of accidents to see what can be done to prevent them. Eliminating moose is not the answer.

  • Moose hunter and highway driver
    January 09, 2013 - 09:47

    Don't worry David, there will be plenty of moose around for your grandchildren to enjoy. To the best of my knowledge, having an overpopulation of moose has never contributed to public safety or any other measure of public well being other than to provide and easier moose harvest and convenience for hunters. If reducing the moose population to a lower level can reduce the incidence of moose vehicle collisions, the benefit outweighs the benefit of easy harvest. As an additional benefit, having all those moose hunters have to exercise a little more to ensure success would certainly also add to our populations health and well being. It's a win win!