• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (196)
  •  

Senator warns of Newfoundland separatism

Published on March 5, 2009
Published on July 1, 2010
The Canadian Press ~ The News  RSS Feed

Politics

A Liberal senator is threatening to push for a separatist movement in Newfoundland and Labrador if the Harper government continues to discriminate against the province.

Senator George Baker not only refused to back down Wednesday from separatist musings earlier this week - he turned up the rhetoric.

Topics :
Baker's , Bloc Newfoundland and Labrador , Bloc Quebecois , Newfoundland and Labrador , OTTAWA , St. John's

OTTAWA -

A Liberal senator is threatening to push for a separatist movement in Newfoundland and Labrador if the Harper government continues to discriminate against the province.

Senator George Baker not only refused to back down Wednesday from separatist musings earlier this week - he turned up the rhetoric.

"I will keep saying it, that if this keeps up then you're going to see a separatist movement in the province of Newfoundland and Labrador - and I'll be encouraging it."

What's more, Baker said if Liberals support another Conservative budget that penalizes Newfoundland, no one will have to kick him out of caucus - he'll quit.

Newfoundlanders are angry at the federal Tories over a budget they say will cost the province up to $1.6 billion in transfers.

Baker said this year's federal budget robs his province of 20 per cent of its revenue, after taking a 15 per cent hit last year.

Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff has echoed much of Baker's criticism of the budget, but has nevertheless decided to support it rather than force an election in the midst of an economic crisis.

He gave his six Newfoundland MPs special dispensation to vote against a preliminary motion giving the budget approval in principle. But he has instructed the Liberal-dominated Senate to quickly pass the budget implementation bill, which will land in the upper house today after winning Commons approval in record time.

Still, Baker said he intends to vote against the bill "at every stage."

Radio musings

Baker first mused about a rise in separatist sentiment in his province during an interview Monday with VOCM radio in St. John's.

Officials from Prime Minister Stephen Harper's office handed out transcripts of Baker's remarks to reporters Wednesday.

"I think that you will find that a great many young people will soon be advocating, you know, that we can't remain in the Confederation in which we're discriminated against and not respected," Baker was quoted as saying.

"How much are we going to put up with? You know, this should be reason enough to, to have a Bloc Newfoundland and Labrador running in the next election if this keeps up - and a real campaign to get them all elected."

A spokesman for Harper demanded that Baker be expelled from the Liberal caucus.

"There's no place for someone who holds those views in a party that purports to be in favour of national unity," Kory Teneycke said.

"You can't advocate for the creation of a Bloc Newfoundland, modelled after the separatist Bloc Quebecois, and sit in our caucus. So I don't think that should be the case in the Liberal caucus, either."

The Tories accused Ignatieff of "tolerating" separatists in his party, first by endorsing an agreement to form a coalition propped up by the separatist Bloc Quebecois, and now refusing to punish Baker, a former MP and cabinet minister and one of the longest-serving Liberal parliamentarians.

Ignatieff shrugged off Tory calls for Baker's expulsion.

"That's too ridiculous to discuss," he said.

Similar statements

Newfoundland MP Gerry Byrne said Baker's remarks are similar to Harper's call for Alberta to set up a "firewall" to minimize the federal government's presence in the province. Harper made those comments during a hiatus from politics, before becoming Tory leader.

Baker insisted he's not promoting separation for his province, simply predicting that separatist sentiment will rise if the federal government continues to penalize Newfoundland as part of Harper's continuing "vendetta" against Premier Danny Williams.

"Why would our young people today put up with that nonsense from a national government? No. It is Stephen Harper's fault if we end up with a Bloc Newfoundland and Labrador party that will be extremely successful, I predict, if he keeps this up."

Comments

  • Username
    NL_Expatriate
    - July 2, 2010 at 15:05:32

    No national PUPPET party of the Upper/Lower Canada majority will ever back Newfoundland and Labradors 1.5% minority if and when the ROC doesnt support it. Its called the national PROXY party line or Tyranny of the majority in our systemically flawed political system.

    To paraphrase President Clinton's campaign manager It's the political system stupid!

    EQUALITY OR EXIT!

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    g-man
    - July 2, 2010 at 15:04:12

    we already have six liberals in the house..now lets try to convince these so called liberal reps to move over to the nl.party..get danny to promote the cause..he[danny]almost ousted harper in the last election..steve harper is a bonehead..

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Angelica
    - July 2, 2010 at 15:04:10

    Baker is NOT promoting separation for his province, simply PREDICTING that separatist sentiment will rise if the federal government continues to penalize Newfoundland...

    Don't shoot the messenger!

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Funky
    - July 2, 2010 at 15:04:06

    Cathy...it is fact. Before the commission of govt, which helped generate the surplus you so strongly like to point out...the country of Newfoundland was broke. The commission was created to give the country a break from politics and the leaders which had run us into the ground. It was created because we were broke and after the commission (caretaker unelected govt) was in power for a few years, a surplus was generated.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    R
    - July 2, 2010 at 15:03:56

    In a nutshell, NL was accepted into Confederation because Ottawa carefully calculated it could get more out of it than it would have to put into it. And Ottawa was right. Again, we let someone else sell our natural resources rather than do it ourselves. Now answer this, do you make more or less profit when you cut out the middleman ?

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Paul
    - July 2, 2010 at 15:03:43

    FM. You have this terrible way of decrying things fact when they are mere opinions or partial facts. Usually when someone keeps saying things like, the fact is, these are the facts , but then don't provide them or are just plain wrong it misleads others into maybe thinking they are facts when they are not. Or maybe they bear some amount of truth. But to say it was just the commission that resurrected us to a surplus fails to realize that we were broke due to the worldwide depression and that amongst all the colonies only Nfld had to pay back war debts to Britain. Also that WWII was good for resource prices, like fish. But we did have some unreal sleavines running Nfld at the time, but those days are also past.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Sid
    - July 2, 2010 at 15:03:40

    AC seems to have the mainlands stereotypical and ignorant view of our place within Canada. That's the very attitude that's fueling separation talk and why people here are so tired of being talked down to as if we were ungrateful children. Who cares what Canada thinks anymore? Enough is enough.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Proud to be here
    - July 2, 2010 at 15:02:34

    George was obviously voicing the frustation many of us feel after the childish retaliation from Harper when Danny hurt his feelings. It only gets worse. Anyone who watched the news saw that moron, Mike Duffy spewing more garbage about the province. He went from journalist to clown as soon as he entered the senate. Job for life and no responsibility for his actions. I wish he would separate.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Herb
    - July 2, 2010 at 15:02:09

    That's the way to go AC. Stand up for all the screwing we get. Don't let anyone suggest that we want to be an equal partner in Canada and how dare our premier suggest that we want to be treated like other Canadians. Don't let it be said that we want to be victims of fairness. Rather give it to us again up the wahzoo.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    It's
    - July 2, 2010 at 15:02:01

    Well, Danny, can we do it? Even if we can't go it alone, can we join another country at least? A country with big guns, we can point them west just for defense. Canada never did want us, which is quite evident in a lot of conversations that we all encounter. I don't care for them either. They have taken or given away our resources to a dangerous point. Even the most nationally-recognized newspaper, The Globe and Mail, constantly ridicules us. I've had enough. Is it possible?

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Si
    - July 2, 2010 at 15:02:00

    Tim from St. John's just proved my point with his silly comments.

    As for GST and so on, don't need them, never did, never will. Like so many other Newfoundlanders I worked and paid my way in life without any government support. So mind you mouth little boy, you know not what you speak about. So tell me Timmy boy, how does it feel to be talked down to?

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Barry
    - July 2, 2010 at 15:01:50

    Us nf's have sat back for way toooooooo long and watched the rest of Canada prosper on the backs of hard working Islanders. With a two faced PM in power someone has to standup and make them take notice. I to love Canada, but to continue under this PC party is embarassing. Why not show Harper? Vie la NL!!!!!!!!!. Maybe we should join our french neighbours in St. Pierre.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Richard
    - July 2, 2010 at 15:01:36

    Why is it that those individuals most eager to push this silly notion are those who have lived a life on the taxpayer teet? When the likes of George Baker and Bill Rowe and the rest of the lunatics running the asylum are willing to give up their cushy public pensions, then maybe I'll separate from Canada and give up the benefits of mine. But not a moment sooner. Hypocrites.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Tim
    - July 2, 2010 at 15:01:22

    Sorry Sibi, I paid more then my fair share and have never obtained the same GST credit that some now want to take from those that have little income.

    Please let me know when you are getting ready to pull the plug so that I can recover my investments in the province(fake wannabe country) prior to heading to the real Canada where people have the option to get ahead.

    When the island is invaded and taken over to be used as a prison please remember you had the chance to get out with your shirt but thought you would stay and remain just as an inmate.

    Who and what will you offer the worlds economy? Where is the Army of Newfoundland. Do not have the population to defend from much more then the common cold. And that would be an effort on the best days.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Manny
    - July 2, 2010 at 15:01:12

    To Lloyd from Labrador: If NL has been sucking so much money out of Labrador for so long, why is the province 12 billion in debt. You guys need to give it a break. This problem is not a simple as it seems. There are numerous communities on the island and coastal labrador without any real employment. That is just a small part of the provinces problems. Also, I seriously doubt that most Labradorians would want to stay with Canada if NL separated. OH shoot, silly me. Then you would have all the profit from Churchill Falls to yourselves, come 2041.

    Give up the BS. If you feel the island part of the province is doing so well, why don't you live there?

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Paul
    - July 2, 2010 at 15:01:08

    To Lloyd: OK, exact numbers weren't the real concept. Would have been more accurate and to the point just to say european descendents to the larger degree. I can appreciate the concept of not having the decision-making ability in your region. But that is the same situation almost everywhere. The people of the Baie Verte Pen get no special compensation for gold from Nugget Pond or other mines. Others get logging permits for wood for CB mill in the Hampden region that benefits no one local to their land. The same problem I found in Chile where most wealth is created in the north but run by central populations. Australia vs Western Australia is the same argument. And Nfld has the same issue with Canada. All these are a matter of scale. If Lab were on it's own I'm sure you'd hear the same complaints from one area that is sick of letting another control the cash that their area produces.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Janet
    - July 2, 2010 at 15:00:41

    Judging by Tony's strong remarks, it appears that George Baker isn't the only person in the province who feels that way.

    It would be interesting to find out how many others share his opinion.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Funky
    - July 2, 2010 at 15:00:31

    I'll separate on one condition...no taxes.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Andre
    - July 2, 2010 at 15:00:28

    I have always respected Mr Baker,that respect just quadropled, Thank you Mr Baker for saying what a very high % of people in NL are thinking, & would love to see. Good Job!!!

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    robert
    - July 2, 2010 at 15:00:10

    i agree with mr baker i would rather seperate and starve than stay apart of canada!!!

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    NL_Expatriate
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:59:53

    Newfoundland and Labrador (national) Energy Plan 2

    Lets put this in perspective for the rest of Canada, at $1.5 billion, thats about $3,000 worth of extra debt every man, woman and child in Newfoundland and Labrador will have thrust on their back by Stephen Harper and his vindictive government on top of the highest per capita provincial debt in the country.

    The rest of Canada seems to see this as a bit of a side show, but if they were taking the hit would they be crying foul? You bet they would.

    If a hit of $3,000 each was taken by the other province, lets see what the calculations would show.

    For Ontario the figure $36.48 billion flows from the 2006 census and the 3k each for Harper.
    Quebec takes a $22.64 billion hypothetical swipe from the feds.

    British Columbia would see $12.34 billion extracted from its budget.

    Alberta, the prime ministers home province, would feel the $9.87 billion pinch.

    A $3.45 billion swat at Manitoba wouldnt go over well.

    Saskatchewan would find a $2.90 billion addition to its debt painful.

    Nova Scotia would likely balk at the $2.74 billion hit.

    New Brunswicks share of $2.20 billion would definitely hurt.

    Prince Edward Islands $3,000 per capita adds up to .41 billion.

    Add in the swipe at the Territories and the federal treasury stands to swell by about $95 billion.

    Would that cause a stir? It would sure wipe out the deficit.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Bruce
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:57:49

    I strongly agree with Mr. Baker. Newfoundland and Labrador needs to rattle a few cages up along. We are taken for granted long enough. Our history as a distinct society, our tremendous abundance of natural resources, our unique geographic location are being dismissed because we let it. We have been mismanaged by our lack of strong leadership seance confederation. It's only now in my life time that I can finally see our people thinking the whole formula for this confederation needs to change. I am glad that people like Danny Williams, George Baker and some others are now starting to spread their enlightenment.

    Bruce

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Don
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:57:44

    Go George. I'm with you. Let's get out while we have the resources before Harper STEAL'S these away----like he's stole everything else.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    W
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:57:32

    I'm with George. We pay our fair share per capita to Canada..............oil, fish, Iron Ore, Nickel, Copper, HYdro Electricity..........imagine if we could keep it all.

    It certainly can't get much worse.

    I don't think Harper would like to see a referendum.

    P.S. I love Canada but if Harper is controlling it..............he'll destroy it too.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    MUN Student
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:57:26

    Count me in George.
    Your views are valid and have been for a long time now. It's time to shake the Canadian cobweds off Newfoundland and Labrador and start the debate.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Short
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:56:56

    I'm sick of Ontario and Quebec running this country. Every single budget bows to them, handing over the majority while the remainder of Canada fights for scraps. Sure, just this week we had an Ontario MP looking to shut down a Newfoundland industry, sealing. Imagine the outrage if NL proposed a bill to shut down all auto plants in Ontario! Harper made a very telling statement before the last election, 'We don't need NL to get elected'. And it's true, there is no equal representation in this country. NL doesn't matter one bit since Ontario and Quebec have all the seats and all the power. I guess the people of this province relish the fact they can get the scraps of central Canada!

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Neil
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:56:39

    I hope all of Canada doesn't think that George Baker is speaking for all NL'ers. Most don't even want to admit he's from here.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Maurice E.
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:56:36

    We dont need others to do us in we do it to ourselves.

    How can six Newfoundland and Labrador Liberal MPs --- who were elected to represent the interests of Newfoundlanders and Labradorians, vote with --- and remain with --- a party that is supporting a federal government decision to take $1.6 billion dollars from their constituents --- constituents that need better roads, better health care, better water and sewer systems, better schools for their children --- and on and on it goes?

    It boggles my mind how they can call themselves Newfoundlanders and Labradorians. We don't need Harper to do us in --- we do it to ourselves.

    Recent events in Ottawa show that we cannot rely on so-called national political parties to stand up for Newfoundland and Labrador.

    As evidenced by the Liberal Partys refusal to stand up for Newfoundland and Labrador, so-called national parties now support each other as dictated by the needs of the region that they represent.

    The Conservatives take care of the West, the Liberals (as evidenced by the budget) take care of Ontario, and the Bloc Quebecois is taking care of Quebec.

    Who then is taking care of and who represents Newfoundland and Labrador?

    Are we content to be recipients of Stevie's vindictiveness --- or Iggy's approval for our NL members to vote in our own best interest?

    Newfoundlanders and Labradorians are more independent than that. We deserve better representation than that.

    In future, majority governments are likely to be few and far between.

    Accordingly, it is time to stop electing MPs to a party that is not willing --- substantively so --- to stand up for Newfoundland and Labrador.

    Otherwise --- we dont need others to do us in we do it to ourselves.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    leo
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:56:33

    I have to give George Baker credit for speaking out,after all we have been treated unfairly by Mr. Harper, as for separating i'm sure long thought would have to be given to that, then on the other hand we have been held ransom by Quebec for years reguarding transmission lines through quebec for future power, what has the Federal Government done about that. Its been an uphill battle for NL from day one.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Graham
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:55:44

    Funky Monkey, the same can be said about any other country/province where greed/corruption was involved. It still happens today in Ottawa, hence this entire discussion. I think many people here realize the POTENTIAL we have as a province to successfully go it alone especially given the higher transparency rate in politics 60 years on. But I suppose you think we'd still have the exact same political systems we and the rest of Canada had 60 years ago. Time to change your negative thinking my friend, and realize time would not have left us behind. Indeed we would have, like all other places, made progress in the advancement of our civlization. It's a very normal process which exists everywhere. Show me ONE place on this planet which has been perfect from the start. But if we had remained independent, I would LOVE to see where we'd be today. But I'm sure you'd think the crowd in Sin Jahn's would still be pulling the wool over the baymen's eyes and robbing them. Think again my friend. I'm quite sure things would not be as dire as you infer.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Graham
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:55:33

    Once a man is down, keep him down, has been the motto of the Feds against NL since NL joined confederation. If you look rationally at it, our years of high unemployment and transfer payments have been CAUSED by the rape of NL by Ottawa. Get rid of the resource-robbing parasite, ie Ottawa, and we'd rise to the occasion and prosper. We entered confederation with a SURPLUS despite having suffered massive manpower losses during our volunteer years fighting the wars in Europe. That says a lot. After confederation we've been kept in poverty. I wonder why that is ? No brainer - Ottawa. Some of you people do not know your NL history very well ( Nasty Nate ) and have put the cart before the horse. We've been robbed of much more than what we've ever received. If we had control of ALL our resources since confederation up to today, we'd have NEVER been on the Feds teet. The Feds have beaten us into submission and dependence - what countries do that today ? Unbelievable.


    We could separate and join a GRATEFUL country, or remain independent and after a few years develop our own industries, defence and infrastructure.


    We vote every few years to determine our leaders. Why not do the same every few years to see what the population says about our sovereignty ? Is it not even MORE important ?


    I SUPPORT SEPARATISM

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Funky
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:55:14

    What if this debate did go anywhere and Labrador, which is a very distinct part of the province and country, with it's own recognizable identity (as I have many friends from there and they consider themselves Labradorians and not Newfoundlanders) decided they wanted no part of separation from Canada and wanted to stay. It's about as possible as Newfoundland fighting for separation. If Labrador went it's own way, the province as we know it today would be ridiculously screwed. I don't think we recognize on the island how important (unbelievable importance the minieral and hydro assets) Labrador has meant to the rest of the province. In reality, we have been sucking Labrador dry of resources much the same way we b***h about the rest of Canada doing to our whole province.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Sandra
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:55:01

    Funkley Monkey needs to read this...

    http://www.heritage.nf.ca/law/econ_impacts.html

    ...to gain perspective on NL's surplus and the Commission of Gov't in NL's economy. (wake up call Funkey Monkey)

    I definitely support separatism, otherwise we will always been dumped on because we are nothings to Ottawa.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    AC
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:55:01

    And Sid, there's nothing stereotypical or ignorant about my original post. Those are the facts. The notion of separation from Canada is incredibly short-sighted and precisely the kind of knee-jerk reaction that has gotten us into bad situations in the past. Churchill Falls, anyone?

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Harper Fan
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:54:41

    I am a stauch Conservative. I believe that the Conservative Party is the best option we CURRENTLY have. But, if a sepratist party came along, I would offer to run for it in an election. We already have the NL First Party, but we need something with money, more candidates, and higher profiles.

    Men, hurrah for our own native Isle, Newfoundland,
    Not a stranger shall hold one inch of her strand;
    Her face turns to Britain, her Back to the Gulf,
    Come near at your peril, Canadian Wolf!

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    John
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:54:28

    Mr. Williams budget on ABC was 81K.
    Why those money were not used on better health care ?.

    I think AB is the the best motor of keeping Ottawa under control.

    This is because in Ottawa very few listen to NL.
    Sad but true.
    No party in Ottawa cares about NL.
    We are too small.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Ches
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:54:23

    Bravo Mr. Baker.

    Name the party and let's move.

    If we are to survive we must either:
    -regain control of our Grand Banks within Canada
    or
    -regain control of our Grand Banks outside of Canada.

    If we fail to achieve this, we are doomed to oblivion and desolation.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    James
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:54:21

    Nfl go for it, do not hold back, and you will never regreat it, we in scotland have been screwed thoughtless since 1745 by that shower down south,as much as we try we canna shake them off, there just like S##T to a blanket.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Frank
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:54:11

    Some posters have mentioned that lack of depth in leadership is a stumbling block to independence. The solution is education. It should be a priority for the province if it seriously decides to head down that road to independence.

    2049 seems like a good year to aim for.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Jim B
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:53:56

    If Danny Williams said something like this, NLers would eat it up without thinking twice!

    Poor old George, no one takes him seriously. Ever.

    More seriously, comments such as these do cause one to question the calibre of individuals in the Senate (yesterday it was Mac Harb, calling for the abolishment of our seal hunt) and the fact that they really do not do much.

    Time to abolish the Senate.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    John
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:53:56

    Comments with a REAL name and address are worth reading; otherwise an anonymous opinion is truly worthless.

    What's everyone afraid of? Is bin Laden going to come after you?

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Ex-Pat in Alberta
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:53:50

    Mr. Baker should watch himself I won't want him to lose his plum job that he was appointed to. Maybe a campain ploy for if they ever make the upper house an elected group.
    Seperation very interesting... Free Newfoundland!!!

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Josh
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:52:48

    FINALLY! someone said it! .... remember this is just a mention of separatism ... not a plan or a formal movement.... but at least the idea is finally getting out there! and he is not alone in thinking this!!! alot of young people agree and i cant wait for the movement to start and the day we leave this sorry excuse of a country! .... when the movement starts, all the information will be put out for everyone to see that we will be better off on our own and all we need is a person to start the ball rolling and present the situation .... a valid person that will organize it .... if only danny would start preacing it... who knows maybe he will in a few years ... cant wait for the day we take down the maple leaf that symbolizes opression of a people and the raping of resources ... and raise the flag of independence

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    A
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:52:43

    Congratulations to George Baker for calling it like it is, he's only telling the truth. My grandfather moved off the island about 50 years ago and it's becoming really tempting for me to move back to Newfoundland. Between economic success and a leadership that will actually fight for it's people. Don't let em kick you around, fight for what's yours.

    You could always end up like Nova Scotia, with a fiddling clown that sells us up river the first chance he gets.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Frank
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:52:37

    Interesting to read all the comments!

    I don,t think I would return to Newfoundland and Labrador and run for The New Newfoundland And Labrador Democratic Party with a vision like Gilles Duceppe to break this great country in pieces. I fought for years against the seperatist in Quebec with the Federal and Provincial Liberals.

    I think the ghosts of Pierre Trudeau, Joey Smallwood and Paul Martin would never let me rest in peace if I ever supported seperatist views.

    I think we should call this new wave of politics the DGGHS ..Danny, George,Gilles, Harper syndrome. They are so confused as to what they want for Canada.

    Frank Blackwood

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Ted
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:52:31

    I totally agree with AC from St. John's. This place wouldn't last 5 minutes alone. Who would lead us? Just think of the clowns we had as premiers since confederation? I can just imagine the amount of corruption that would have ensued, not to mention that which has already taken place. A few oils bucks roll in and everyone get suddenly becomes patriotic and cocky by the rhetoric of a few pension seeking politicians whose only qualification is that they happened to have been the local school principal or hockey coach. Yeah, now there's something you can build a nation upon.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Lloyd
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:52:00

    There have been moments I've been a fan of Mr. Baker. Some moments.

    Judging by commentary on the local call in shows (callers and certain host(s), perhaps even some government people, and even one or two comments here, I'd say he will help garner a little support for the idea in Newfoundland. Seems there is such a party in existence ready to serve that purpose?

    In Labrador, though, we have a little different problem. Our problem has been in getting fair treatment from the provincial government rather than from the Feds. Unlike the provincial government, we have no constitutionally guaranteed rights regarding resource extraction, disposition, or just returns, nor do we have any really say in the matter on how to rectify those issues so far.
    In 1948 Labradorians voted overwhelmingly at 80 plus percent to join Canada. If that number has changed, I'd say it has been upward.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Frank
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:51:48

    This a cheap shot from George Baker who got brushed under the carpet some years ago because of his unrealistic visions. He articulates very well on what others think is best for Newfoundland and Labrador, not what George really has in mind.

    To talk about seperating from Canada is one of the most immature and unrealistic gestures a well respected politicians like George Baker could make. This would be like removing the bedrock of the Atlantic ocean, and letting the island of Newfoundland and Labrador sink beneath.

    You see, George can make remarks like this today as noone will sweep him under the carpet tomorrow. Newfoundlanders will never walk away from Canada

    Frank Blackwood

    **Formerly of Wesleyville.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    John
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:50:58

    Funy Monkey. The War created the surplus. It was not the Commission of Government. Don't you know that? And Newfoundland lost it independence NOT because of debt but because of ASSETS. The British wanted to control Newfoundland outright because of its war time value. We did not LOSE independence. It was STOLEN from us.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Nasty
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:49:51

    Just a few simple questions and comments for Mr. Baker.

    You will be out your job since your services will no longer be required if Newfoundland was not a province or a part of Canada. Talk about shooting oneself in the proverbial foot.

    Just where is the province going to go? Who will we join to survive in the global scheme of things, Russia, Cuba? Where is our army, navy and air force to defend from the evil Canada and USA?

    What will be done to sustain the population? We know that we are not able to provide for ourselves due to location. We have no industry to provide an export commodity demanded by world markets.

    So, just where is this plan of yours or did Fabian Manning put you up to this on Dannys behalf?

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Tim
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:49:36

    Hey Sid, bet you can not wait for your GST cheques and tax returns. Oh thats right you are not part of Canada and do not want that anymore. Good for you. You are helping with our National Debt for not accepting the benefits that are given to all Canadians.

    Guess you will need a passport, work permit and VISA to enter Canada for work that you can not nor will not be able to obtain here then too :)

    Thought so. Lot more to this then you might think.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    AC
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:49:29

    Pretty embarrassing comments from Georgie here. How quickly we forget how long we, as a province, sucked the Federal government's teet--highest unemployment rate in the country, abnormally high welfare (or whatever the politically correct term is these days) rate, not to mention the endless years of receiving transfer payments as have-not province. Now that we are finally generating some revenue on our own, we have this blow-hard making us look like a bunch of ungrateful fools. Not to mention Danny running his mouth every chance he gets. We took and took and took for decades while other provinces gave. Now it's our turn the return the favour. Deal with it.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Sean
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:49:29

    I'm with Baker and alot of fellow Newfoundlanders , lets get out of this crazy country we call Canada, I had to move away with my family years ago to support my family, do you think it's a better life up here than it is back home...NO it's not

    I say it's time to seperate and drop Harper like a bad habit, who needs him, Surely we would be better off on our own that we are curently. Count me in for walking in downtown Toronto holding a NL to seperate sign any day.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Funky
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:49:21

    My facts are real because I say they are.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    NL_Expatriate
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:49:18

    Inform yourself
    Royal Commission on Newfoundland and Labrador's place in canada.
    http://www.exec.gov.nl.ca/royalcomm/

    Report on negotiations duress, conflict of interest leading up to Upper Churchill contract.
    http://www.ucs.mun.ca/~feehan/CF.pdf

    Quebec gets 2 Billion a year from Upper Churchill.
    http://www.thetelegram.com/index.cfm?sid=219507&sc=79

    Short history on Equalization/Atlantic Accord
    http://www.irpp.org/po/archive/mar07/courchene.pdf

    Great summary of Atlantic Accord/Equalization links.
    http://www.rantandroar.ca/accord.htm

    Video presentation on automatic extension renewal clause for Upper Churchill.
    http://www.mun.ca/harriscentre/Memorial_Presents/Churchill_Falls/churchill_falls_video.php

    Independent cost benefit analysis
    http://www.theindependent.ca/pdf/Cost_benefit_methodology.pdf

    This is just a primer it doesn't touch on many many other burning issues.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Funky
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:49:09

    Graham? Are you serious? Your telling other people they know little about NL history?

    I think you need to brush up a little my friend. Newfoundland was always destitute. Yeah, we had a surplus when we joined confederation...sure. That's corrrect. But that came after years of commission of govt rule where we had an unelected group of indivduals running the country (mainly British citizens). Before the commission of govt was created (to give us a break from our own politicians) NL was basically bankrupt. We were screwed because of the greed and careless leadership we had in the country before that. Newfoundland was a sinking ship. Instead of a ruling class in Ottawa, we had a ruling class in St. John's which raped the rest of the provnice for their own benefit and the benefit of the capital city region (sound familiar?). There were no good times in NL my friend. Learn your own history before you start bashing the understanding of others.

    When people voted...outside of St. John's they voted overwhelmingly in favour of confederation. The only real opposition to confederation was in the St. John's area where those previously in power were afraid they were about to lose all their control. People voted in favour of confederation outside of St. John's because the leadership of Canada couldn't be any worse then the leadership of the ruling class in St. John's.

    If Newfoundland was meant to be a country, it would still be one. This separatism debate is a joke.

    And whoever mentioned the NLFirst Party should take a look at their webpage and actually listen to them. They're a group of clowns.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    What a
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:48:26

    So here is a little food for thought. For those that think you will be better off as a country on our own, answer these simple questions. Where are the practical jobs in this province? Why is it that this province boasts the highest unemployment rates in Canada when it has been considered to be a have province? Where are the sustainable jobs that were promised with the stimulus plans from both Danny and Stevie?

    Who are you going to sell iron ore to if the steel mills and auto plants are shutting down?
    Are we ready to pay higher tariffs on imports and exports to get our way?

    Lots of talk, but like normal no real plan or action from anyone to make anything more then a fuss over nothing.

    I would really like to see someone put out a little more then lip service for a change. People have offered to create employment in this province, yet the status quo remains where those given the grants and funding to do so use the lions share to fill their personal pockets with little thought to the rest of the people that need to survive.

    Once you get a plan and your act together the rest of the world just might take you seriously for a change. Till that time comes we will continue to live in poverty.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Winston
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:48:21

    Iggy is finally right about something: this is ridiculous.

    What a fascinatingly disingenuous distinction Baker is trying to make: predicting something is the opposite of promoting it.

    Like someone else we all know, he wants to save Canada by discussing its breakup. Baker wants to promote Canadian unity so much that he must go on every media outlet in the entire country talking manically about separatism.

    The lavish media attention must be a real Lenten sacrifice for the good Senator.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    danny
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:48:14

    It is about time Newfoundlander's hear the truth about the discrimination bias diffarances concerning our well being. I have lived in almost every province, I have been asked for my visa by a government official, this its self tells me that our government had no interest in our province until they realized that we had enough natural resources that they could squander like our electricity, I think if one province could threaten to go it on their own, why do we accept our leader wanting to remove one of our own from government, other people seem to be aloud to speak out but when we do Stephen Harper want to shut us up, we worked hard to build this country and now we are being ripped of again. I have talked to many Newfoundlander's who thinks this would be the best for our province. then and only then we could be self sufficient, I have thrown this idea out to other countries that are interested in our resources. The Chinese, Europe, Indians, all have interest in our wealth and kindness. If our own government can't accept us for who we are well it is probably time we think of our own and separate from those who rob us and treat us different than the rest of Canada. Not everyone have seen this, it has only been since the internet came available to Newfoundlander and its people that we have a voice. If the government had it their way we would be shut out of every decision made in parliament. Danny Williams is like a god to us he is the only politician who speaks the truth, if we loose Danny our government will try and sell us out again, another thing the U.S.A. have hard liners who work with the federal politicians to buy up our oil, electricity an any thing they could get their hands on, we fought in a war against the enemy, so what makes us cowards when it comes to separation issues, We need to stand behind Danny Williams and his agenda to have a voice on the world market and it's decisions.. Yours Truly Daniel T. Duke Thursday March 5th. 2009 WE DO HAVE A VOICE SO STAND UP AND MAKE YOUR VOICE HEARD!!!!!

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Saucy Face
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:47:57

    Vive Terra Nouveau Libre ... Or something like that:)

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    mercedes
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:47:46

    This is the foolishest thing I've ever heard! Don't you realize that if we separated we would have to take Mr. williams along as king? He'd have even more power then! Power to stomp on anyone who is not his buddy! At least now we have token protection from the federal party becausy of that sad and haunting word; democracy!

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Stewart
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:47:33

    Plain and simple, Canada is the greatest country on earth. I am a proud citizen of Canada and a proud Newfoundlander, but talk of a separatist movement is ludicrous.
    Yes, fight for what is ours but remember we are a part of a bigger family that allows us to freely express our concerns and live in peace.
    I think the benefits of living in this country far outweigh the negatives.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    John
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:46:55

    This Newfoundlander living away from home says George Baker has it spot-on.

    The NEWFOUNDLAND BLOC in Ottawa is an excellent idea whose time has definitely come. As things stand today, the tenth province will never be treated fairly in this federation.

    It should be obvious to everyone that the louder the Quebec nationalists and separatists shout, the better they get treated by Ottawa.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Shannon
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:46:23

    This talk is absolute nonsense. Danny Williams has really got people believing that Ottawa is the Evil Empire.

    I am no fan of Harper, and even less a fan of D.W. The former's tenure won't last much longer in its MINORITY state. When Iggy and Danny band together, quite possibly when Ig becomes PM, will George Baker - who's just looking for some attention again - and the rest of you separatists be crying to leave Canada, big bad evil Canada??

    Why doesn't George direct some of his vitriol towards Williams, architect of the ABC Campaign which saw us lose over a BILLION and a half dollars??

    Get a grip, folks. This misguided passion makes everything that much more appalling and ridiculous.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Cindy
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:45:56

    Ottawa has never had respect for the people of NL (Newfoundland AND Labrador). Even after we sent all our men and boys to fight and die for Canada in the 2nd world war, which left our society in near ruins post war. Was this not the key factor in NL joining Canada initially? The losses we endured due to the war? Our population was devastated and as such, pinned all the hopes of a brighter and more prosperous future on Joey Smallwood's claim to a greater life through Confederation? What was there to think about back then? ...If we join Canada maybe we can eat 7 days a week! Well, it hasn't worked out to be that great a life because of confederation now has it? What do you think would have happened if NL had been in a healthier financial place post WW2? Joey Smallwood would have been KING!

    Let's see how much better off NL is after confederation...I will need your help...

    Please list 10 Great things NL has benefited from directly BECAUSE of confederation...

    1.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    dennis
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:45:56

    Interesting topic this, full of emotion. Can anyone actually put some numbers behind the claims that Canada has robbed Newfoundland of it wealth? If one were to total up how much went out and how much came in, who would win and who would lose.
    But, the question is, could Newfoundland go it alone? It has a moderate amount of natural resourses, but nothing that makes me think that a country could be run on it. Outside of that there is really very little industry and manufacturing, almost no agriculture, no banking, a very, very small tourist industry, a fishery that is in shambles, a small population spread out over a very big area, and a reasonably high debt. To argue that it has a great geographical location is a bit on the bizarre side. It is a big island stuck out in the middle of the North Atlantic with arguably some of the worst weather in the world. Beautiful, I admit, but all planes to North America fly over, the vast majority of ships pass right on by, and mostly people crossing the gulf are returning home for holidays. This hardly speaks of a great geographical location that is of enormous interest to, say the European Union as some have pointed out.

    It seems to me then, that the real issue is why Newfoundland politicians have so little influence in Ottawa. Obviously with a demographic model for determining numbers of MP's Newfoundland will not have many, but can they be more effective? Perhaps electing people who have strength of character and ideas that go beyond threatening to leave when things aren't going their way might be helpful.

    I shall look up the Newfoundland First - or whatever it is called. Sounds like fun.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    On My Way
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:45:45

    Count me down as a separtist...that is...If this BlocNL BS progresses and a separtist movement becomes more mainstream in NL, my family will be separating from NL - permanantly.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Funky
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:45:14

    Spouting the same nonsense over and over again doesn't make it come true, no matter how much you want it too and no matter how much it helps your feeble argument.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    NL_Expatriate
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:44:59

    The Supreme Court of Canada basically said that the 'only' reason the off-shore could be considered to be owned by Canada is because of third-party international law. The court actually said that the status of these resources is very much in the hands of NL. They demonstrated their meaning by saying, and I paraphrase, 'not-with-standing international laws, NL brought those resources into Canada, and NL can take them back out'.

    So in response to this the Atlantic Accord compromise was reached. In that deal the rest of Canada gets to suck the teat of yet more of our resources. Harper has twice unilaterally violated that compromise agreement in order to suck a little more out of NL's share. Talk about bumming off the poor!

    It's our cake why shouldn't we be allowed to eat it?
    To expand on the simplistic cake/Grand Banks resources metaphor.

    Inform yourself
    Royal Commission on Newfoundland and Labrador's place in canada.
    http://www.exec.gov.nl.ca/royalcomm/

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Looking
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:44:57

    Still see no answers to the questions. Where are the jobs, where is the exports, where are the buyers? Who is going to pay for this dream?

    Where is the plan? All talk no action. Thats been and will continue to be the problem here till we get our acts together.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Lloyd
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:44:12

    Paul from StJohns writes:
    As for Labrador, most people there are transplanted islanders anyway. The reason there is development there is due to the people who moved up there and did it, and they are basically the same people who live on the island. unquote.

    Most people? Nearly half the people the people in Labrador are Aboriginals.
    Many of the people are descended from people who came here directly from Europe and other parts of what is now Canada. Many, not most, or their original families are are from Newfoundland. Most of them now consider Labrador their home and native land. From my own experience and observation, many if not most of them realize the unfair treatment at the hands of the provincial government.
    Most people also realize that the LACK of development here is because WE don't get to make our own developmental decisions and suffer the losses because most of OUR resources have gone to benefit others - at the HAND of the PROVINCIAL government who has constitutional control of all land based resources.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Jack
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:44:11

    What an insult to Canadians. Here is a Canadian Senator appointed to such a prestigious position advocating for separation! Go back to the open line shows and getting people riled up over the price of turnips. On the way out leave your Canadian senator salary and pension.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Townie
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:44:10

    I'm behind you all the way George baker seperate the Canadian Government screwed us enough the republic of Nf Priminster Danny all the way.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Truman
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:44:05

    no surplus now funkey monkey or whatever your foolish name is

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    kirby
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:43:48

    i see this as something akin to a chest found in an attic...a BOX if you please...and many 'newfoundlings' are overjoyed at the prospects it may hold.
    as a labrador native,i am not anxious,because we know what is in the box for our Native Peoples...ORIGINAL JURISDICTION is just one issue that springs to mind.
    open it up...'newly founde'...landers.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Mike
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:43:34

    If you were taking a poll of the comments above - 16 comments for / 17 comments against at this point (approx. 50% for / 50% against).

    I do believe there is a growing sentiment towards our place in Canada - now whether that justifies a separatist movement - time will tell.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Dumbfounded
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:43:26

    Who is this idiot AC ?? Honestly do you really believe what your saying. Unreal the stupidity that writes on this forum.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    AC
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:43:25

    Jimmy, Alberta was generally against Federal 'intereference' long before the profits of the oilsands, back to when agriculture was their primary revenue source. Even during their most difficult times, during the oil collapse of the early 1980s, they still only hit 10% unemployment, and as a province have not received anywhere close to the amount of Federal money that Newfoundland has over the decades. It's not uncommon at all for profitable businesses to detest the Government due to regulation and taxation. My point is that Newfoundland has taken far too much to be suddenly spewing separation rhetoric now that we have had a couple of prosperous years.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    John
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:42:15

    George Baker is a fool,what more than that can I say.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Funky
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:42:04

    John...if I tell people my name, people will know who I am.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Mike
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:41:58

    Baker refers to Harpers vendetta against the province but strained relations with Ottawa are nothing new regardless of which party is in power. If we, or any other province, wanted to take our ball and go home every time we felt the game was being played unfairly, Canada would not exist. But Canada does exist warts and all.

    Every province has a beef with the Federal government. However, not every province wants to go it alone. Sure there are fringe elements whose sole purpose is to separate but they are viewed with contempt or indifference. The Bloc Quebecois is as good example as any.

    But Canada is a democracy and people are free to express their opinions just as George Baker has done. We can include comments from Mike Duffy, Globe and Mail editorials and infamous newfie jokes. People can say what they wish. Its a free country. But we are just as free to agree or disagree with what they say and freely express our opinions without fear of retribution.

    Eventually Harper will be gone as Prime Minister, but problems with Ottawa will remain. Our relationship is tenuous at best and in all likelihood, will continue to be that way. But that doesnt mean we have to pack up house and leave. We offer a lot to the country, and it offers a lot to us. And as proud as we are to call ourselves Newfoundlanders, we should be just as proud to call ourselves Canadians.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Frank
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:41:11

    I have to agree with Neil from Newfoundland. George Baker doesn,t speak for all Newfoundlanders.

    He likes to stir up a lot of dust like a crackie having a dump on a sandpile and then runs back home with his tail between the hind legs ,begging for a reward as it didn,t pee on the carpet.

    I don't think George will have the support of our younger politicians in Ottawa today.
    Frank Blackwood

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    AC
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:40:56

    This will be my last post on this thread, just wanted to respond to some of the laughable claims about not knowing history. We may have entered into Confederation in 1949 with a surplus, but what didn't we have? Well, let's see... 50% of the population had no electricity. No connecting highway system. No child allowances, extremely high unemployment, poor health care and virtually no social assistance programs. It's a give and take scenario. They benefitted from our natural resources and we benefitted from their infrastructure improvements and social programs. It's easy to blame Ottawa for everything, but if we'd had one or two even HALF capable premiers over the years, who knows where we'd be?

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Cathy
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:40:19

    In the 60 years since confederation, despite having lost most of our men during the wars, we still had a surplus like another commenter mentioned. If we had stayed independent, we would have developed all of our own infrastructure WITHOUT outside so-called help. To AC, around confederation (1949 just after WW2), the whole world had high unemployment, basically NO social assistance programs and poor health care. As a matter of fact, in case you haven't noticed, we STILL have poor health care, poor social assistance programs and moderately high unemployment, and we're now set to lose even more thanks to the hostililty of our Prime Minister towards us. If we had control over our own resources, we would have been much further ahead than we are right now. Try and refute that. Talk sense man.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Jimmy
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:40:16

    To AC from St. John's: Point taken. Perhaps I should take a closer look at Canadian history.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Barry
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:40:02

    Robert if you dont like it move to Quebec you would fit right in. thats Dannys next plan. He will become emperor of Quebec and Newfoundland.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Mark
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:40:00

    Cathy - 'we would have developed all of our own infrastructure'?

    With what? Seriously - every bit of infrastructure was built by the British who were broke and tired of paying for us, and in later years by the temporary military presence. After Confederation, billions flowed from Ottawa to get our roads, schools and hospitals up to snuff. Without this money, dear Cathy, please tell me who the heck would have built our infrastruture? The fish merchants? Not bloody likely.

    Are there problems in our federation? Absolutely. But anyone who believes Newfoundland would have been better off on its own after 1949 needs to see a doctor.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Tony
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:39:54

    Seems like George has hurt Canada's feelings.

    I'm surprised that it has taken this long for someone in his position to say it since he's only saying what most here are thinking anyway. AND yes all you lCanada lovers, I feel that I am speaking for the very patient and silent majority within Newfoundland and Labrador. It's time for all of us to reconsider this so called democracy called Canada.

    Good for you George. Nice to see someone here who's not afraid to speak the truth. Time for others to follow his lead.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Common Sense
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:39:44

    For those of you who believe NL would be better off as its own state, let me just say two things

    1 - MHA Spending Scandal - you think that was bad, imagine what would it be like then, you would have every politician scrambling to steal every dollar they could get their hands on

    2 - Crap Health System becomes even crappier.

    Yeah, go separatism!!!! Whatever.

    Nuff Said

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Paul
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:39:43

    Great to see how many people have had enough and really look at separation as a viable option. Too bad people like AC don't know anything about history. He says we've received so much, but fails to understand that we have given more than we've ever received and that continues today.

    As for others who wonder who we will link up with, the answer in no one. We'll be fine by ourselves.

    As for Labrador, most people there are transplanted islanders anyway. The reason there is development there is due to the people who moved up there and did it, and they are basically the same people who live on the island. It's just a bit hard to provide the infrastructure to such a large place with such a small population. But it seems to progressing gradually as I've seen in my time up there recently. If we had been our own country I don't think Labrador would now be underdeveloped. We'd have loads of Upper Churchill bucks, would be shipping out steel or cars, not raw ore, fueled by Churchill power, access to forests able to be provided. The fact that the entire province has been impoverished by Canada means it's hard to provide proper service easily and the smaller and more distant populations are more likely to suffer most. But we still need to stick together.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Jesse
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:39:35

    As a Labradorian, I find Newfoundland Separatism funny. Possibly because of the assumption that Labradorians would want to go too.

    And the kvetching about the federal government doing things to Newfoundland, and ignoring that the provincial government does the same to Labrador. Like the plan to ignore every single community on the coast of Labrador should the Lower Churchill project ever finish and the power routed to the island. And the hand wringing over how running those power lines through a precious park in Newfoundland will destroy its scenic beauty (while ignoring what it will do to the landscape of Labrador).

    Those who live in glass houses with bongs lying around shouldn't whine about their neighbour's drinking habits.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Gerry
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:39:27

    I have to laugh about the PC member getting offended by George Baker , and wanting him fired , and saying we cant form a seperatist group, what does he think Quebec is??? This is the only country in the world that would allow a sitting party whose soul purpose is to seperate and their own interest looked after,anywhere else they would be outlawed.In the meen time George Baker is right ,i'am teaching my son about politics and how we've been treated by Ottawa, If i had my way we would leave now , Think the USA wouldn't want us?? We've been held down long enough Stevie!!!

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Jimmy
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:39:26

    To AC from St. John's: Look at your Canadian history. Alberta was once a have-not province. And see how quickly they tried to turn on Confederation when the oil sands money started to pad the accounts. Even the current prime minister once advocated a 'firewall' to isolate Alberta from the rest of Canada.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    NL_Expatriate
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:39:18

    Equality or Exit!

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    2cents
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:38:55

    Sepratisim is always in the back of many people's heads here in this province. I myself would support a sepratist party. Why is it ok for Quebec to have a Bloc Quebcois but not Newfoundland and Labrador? Frankly I am sick and tired of the double standards that the present ruling federal party hold so near and dear.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Willy
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:38:55

    I'm a bit surprised by Sean Hurleys comment about it being a better life in NL than he's able to find in Brampton . Would you rather have your family on Pogey, or maybe you miss your Skidoo or the Quad . Maybe you miss loafing around on the Wharf with your hands in your pockets complaining why your cheque isn't in the mail yet . My friend , that's your opinion and you're entitled to it , but don't include me and the thousands of others who left for a better life . I wouldn't trade my position for anything . Yep , i retired at 55 and still live in Ontario . I've got what i need and am satisfied .

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Roxanne
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:38:38

    I am ashamed to be a Canadian living in Newfoundland, I would rather be called an American, even when the likes of Bush was President.

    Our only hope is we take some stand and maybe Baker is right, a NL Bloc may be the way to go. I would gladly give up my $30 GST to have my Newfoundland dignity back.

    George Baker, if you want to do this I think you will have a following, and a huge one. We are tired of being the laughing stock of Canada.

    Lets see whose resources would suffer the most if we pulled out of Canada.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Michael
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:38:35

    Just because we would not be a part of Canada does not mean that we would have to be desolate. Due to our resources, econemy and geographic location we would be very attractive to the European Union and the U.S.

    We will never be treated like equals in Canada because we don't have enough votes and we don't share the same needs as the majority of Canadian provinces. To stay in power, politicians need to please the majority. Unfortunately, we will never be the majority.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    NL_Expatriate
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:55:40

    No national PUPPET party of the Upper/Lower Canada majority will ever back Newfoundland and Labradors 1.5% minority if and when the ROC doesnt support it. Its called the national PROXY party line or Tyranny of the majority in our systemically flawed political system.

    To paraphrase President Clinton's campaign manager It's the political system stupid!

    EQUALITY OR EXIT!

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    g-man
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:53:18

    we already have six liberals in the house..now lets try to convince these so called liberal reps to move over to the nl.party..get danny to promote the cause..he[danny]almost ousted harper in the last election..steve harper is a bonehead..

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Angelica
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:53:15

    Baker is NOT promoting separation for his province, simply PREDICTING that separatist sentiment will rise if the federal government continues to penalize Newfoundland...

    Don't shoot the messenger!

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Funky
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:53:10

    Cathy...it is fact. Before the commission of govt, which helped generate the surplus you so strongly like to point out...the country of Newfoundland was broke. The commission was created to give the country a break from politics and the leaders which had run us into the ground. It was created because we were broke and after the commission (caretaker unelected govt) was in power for a few years, a surplus was generated.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    R
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:52:52

    In a nutshell, NL was accepted into Confederation because Ottawa carefully calculated it could get more out of it than it would have to put into it. And Ottawa was right. Again, we let someone else sell our natural resources rather than do it ourselves. Now answer this, do you make more or less profit when you cut out the middleman ?

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Paul
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:52:30

    FM. You have this terrible way of decrying things fact when they are mere opinions or partial facts. Usually when someone keeps saying things like, the fact is, these are the facts , but then don't provide them or are just plain wrong it misleads others into maybe thinking they are facts when they are not. Or maybe they bear some amount of truth. But to say it was just the commission that resurrected us to a surplus fails to realize that we were broke due to the worldwide depression and that amongst all the colonies only Nfld had to pay back war debts to Britain. Also that WWII was good for resource prices, like fish. But we did have some unreal sleavines running Nfld at the time, but those days are also past.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Sid
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:52:27

    AC seems to have the mainlands stereotypical and ignorant view of our place within Canada. That's the very attitude that's fueling separation talk and why people here are so tired of being talked down to as if we were ungrateful children. Who cares what Canada thinks anymore? Enough is enough.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Proud to be here
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:51:27

    George was obviously voicing the frustation many of us feel after the childish retaliation from Harper when Danny hurt his feelings. It only gets worse. Anyone who watched the news saw that moron, Mike Duffy spewing more garbage about the province. He went from journalist to clown as soon as he entered the senate. Job for life and no responsibility for his actions. I wish he would separate.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Herb
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:50:56

    That's the way to go AC. Stand up for all the screwing we get. Don't let anyone suggest that we want to be an equal partner in Canada and how dare our premier suggest that we want to be treated like other Canadians. Don't let it be said that we want to be victims of fairness. Rather give it to us again up the wahzoo.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    It's
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:50:45

    Well, Danny, can we do it? Even if we can't go it alone, can we join another country at least? A country with big guns, we can point them west just for defense. Canada never did want us, which is quite evident in a lot of conversations that we all encounter. I don't care for them either. They have taken or given away our resources to a dangerous point. Even the most nationally-recognized newspaper, The Globe and Mail, constantly ridicules us. I've had enough. Is it possible?

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Si
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:50:42

    Tim from St. John's just proved my point with his silly comments.

    As for GST and so on, don't need them, never did, never will. Like so many other Newfoundlanders I worked and paid my way in life without any government support. So mind you mouth little boy, you know not what you speak about. So tell me Timmy boy, how does it feel to be talked down to?

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Barry
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:50:26

    Us nf's have sat back for way toooooooo long and watched the rest of Canada prosper on the backs of hard working Islanders. With a two faced PM in power someone has to standup and make them take notice. I to love Canada, but to continue under this PC party is embarassing. Why not show Harper? Vie la NL!!!!!!!!!. Maybe we should join our french neighbours in St. Pierre.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Richard
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:50:13

    Why is it that those individuals most eager to push this silly notion are those who have lived a life on the taxpayer teet? When the likes of George Baker and Bill Rowe and the rest of the lunatics running the asylum are willing to give up their cushy public pensions, then maybe I'll separate from Canada and give up the benefits of mine. But not a moment sooner. Hypocrites.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Tim
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:49:49

    Sorry Sibi, I paid more then my fair share and have never obtained the same GST credit that some now want to take from those that have little income.

    Please let me know when you are getting ready to pull the plug so that I can recover my investments in the province(fake wannabe country) prior to heading to the real Canada where people have the option to get ahead.

    When the island is invaded and taken over to be used as a prison please remember you had the chance to get out with your shirt but thought you would stay and remain just as an inmate.

    Who and what will you offer the worlds economy? Where is the Army of Newfoundland. Do not have the population to defend from much more then the common cold. And that would be an effort on the best days.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Manny
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:49:34

    To Lloyd from Labrador: If NL has been sucking so much money out of Labrador for so long, why is the province 12 billion in debt. You guys need to give it a break. This problem is not a simple as it seems. There are numerous communities on the island and coastal labrador without any real employment. That is just a small part of the provinces problems. Also, I seriously doubt that most Labradorians would want to stay with Canada if NL separated. OH shoot, silly me. Then you would have all the profit from Churchill Falls to yourselves, come 2041.

    Give up the BS. If you feel the island part of the province is doing so well, why don't you live there?

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Paul
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:49:27

    To Lloyd: OK, exact numbers weren't the real concept. Would have been more accurate and to the point just to say european descendents to the larger degree. I can appreciate the concept of not having the decision-making ability in your region. But that is the same situation almost everywhere. The people of the Baie Verte Pen get no special compensation for gold from Nugget Pond or other mines. Others get logging permits for wood for CB mill in the Hampden region that benefits no one local to their land. The same problem I found in Chile where most wealth is created in the north but run by central populations. Australia vs Western Australia is the same argument. And Nfld has the same issue with Canada. All these are a matter of scale. If Lab were on it's own I'm sure you'd hear the same complaints from one area that is sick of letting another control the cash that their area produces.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Janet
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:48:41

    Judging by Tony's strong remarks, it appears that George Baker isn't the only person in the province who feels that way.

    It would be interesting to find out how many others share his opinion.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Funky
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:48:25

    I'll separate on one condition...no taxes.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Andre
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:48:19

    I have always respected Mr Baker,that respect just quadropled, Thank you Mr Baker for saying what a very high % of people in NL are thinking, & would love to see. Good Job!!!

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    robert
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:47:50

    i agree with mr baker i would rather seperate and starve than stay apart of canada!!!

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    NL_Expatriate
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:47:25

    Newfoundland and Labrador (national) Energy Plan 2

    Lets put this in perspective for the rest of Canada, at $1.5 billion, thats about $3,000 worth of extra debt every man, woman and child in Newfoundland and Labrador will have thrust on their back by Stephen Harper and his vindictive government on top of the highest per capita provincial debt in the country.

    The rest of Canada seems to see this as a bit of a side show, but if they were taking the hit would they be crying foul? You bet they would.

    If a hit of $3,000 each was taken by the other province, lets see what the calculations would show.

    For Ontario the figure $36.48 billion flows from the 2006 census and the 3k each for Harper.
    Quebec takes a $22.64 billion hypothetical swipe from the feds.

    British Columbia would see $12.34 billion extracted from its budget.

    Alberta, the prime ministers home province, would feel the $9.87 billion pinch.

    A $3.45 billion swat at Manitoba wouldnt go over well.

    Saskatchewan would find a $2.90 billion addition to its debt painful.

    Nova Scotia would likely balk at the $2.74 billion hit.

    New Brunswicks share of $2.20 billion would definitely hurt.

    Prince Edward Islands $3,000 per capita adds up to .41 billion.

    Add in the swipe at the Territories and the federal treasury stands to swell by about $95 billion.

    Would that cause a stir? It would sure wipe out the deficit.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Bruce
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:45:32

    I strongly agree with Mr. Baker. Newfoundland and Labrador needs to rattle a few cages up along. We are taken for granted long enough. Our history as a distinct society, our tremendous abundance of natural resources, our unique geographic location are being dismissed because we let it. We have been mismanaged by our lack of strong leadership seance confederation. It's only now in my life time that I can finally see our people thinking the whole formula for this confederation needs to change. I am glad that people like Danny Williams, George Baker and some others are now starting to spread their enlightenment.

    Bruce

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Don
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:45:24

    Go George. I'm with you. Let's get out while we have the resources before Harper STEAL'S these away----like he's stole everything else.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    W
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:45:03

    I'm with George. We pay our fair share per capita to Canada..............oil, fish, Iron Ore, Nickel, Copper, HYdro Electricity..........imagine if we could keep it all.

    It certainly can't get much worse.

    I don't think Harper would like to see a referendum.

    P.S. I love Canada but if Harper is controlling it..............he'll destroy it too.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    MUN Student
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:44:55

    Count me in George.
    Your views are valid and have been for a long time now. It's time to shake the Canadian cobweds off Newfoundland and Labrador and start the debate.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Short
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:44:11

    I'm sick of Ontario and Quebec running this country. Every single budget bows to them, handing over the majority while the remainder of Canada fights for scraps. Sure, just this week we had an Ontario MP looking to shut down a Newfoundland industry, sealing. Imagine the outrage if NL proposed a bill to shut down all auto plants in Ontario! Harper made a very telling statement before the last election, 'We don't need NL to get elected'. And it's true, there is no equal representation in this country. NL doesn't matter one bit since Ontario and Quebec have all the seats and all the power. I guess the people of this province relish the fact they can get the scraps of central Canada!

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Neil
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:43:43

    I hope all of Canada doesn't think that George Baker is speaking for all NL'ers. Most don't even want to admit he's from here.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Maurice E.
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:43:38

    We dont need others to do us in we do it to ourselves.

    How can six Newfoundland and Labrador Liberal MPs --- who were elected to represent the interests of Newfoundlanders and Labradorians, vote with --- and remain with --- a party that is supporting a federal government decision to take $1.6 billion dollars from their constituents --- constituents that need better roads, better health care, better water and sewer systems, better schools for their children --- and on and on it goes?

    It boggles my mind how they can call themselves Newfoundlanders and Labradorians. We don't need Harper to do us in --- we do it to ourselves.

    Recent events in Ottawa show that we cannot rely on so-called national political parties to stand up for Newfoundland and Labrador.

    As evidenced by the Liberal Partys refusal to stand up for Newfoundland and Labrador, so-called national parties now support each other as dictated by the needs of the region that they represent.

    The Conservatives take care of the West, the Liberals (as evidenced by the budget) take care of Ontario, and the Bloc Quebecois is taking care of Quebec.

    Who then is taking care of and who represents Newfoundland and Labrador?

    Are we content to be recipients of Stevie's vindictiveness --- or Iggy's approval for our NL members to vote in our own best interest?

    Newfoundlanders and Labradorians are more independent than that. We deserve better representation than that.

    In future, majority governments are likely to be few and far between.

    Accordingly, it is time to stop electing MPs to a party that is not willing --- substantively so --- to stand up for Newfoundland and Labrador.

    Otherwise --- we dont need others to do us in we do it to ourselves.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    leo
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:43:33

    I have to give George Baker credit for speaking out,after all we have been treated unfairly by Mr. Harper, as for separating i'm sure long thought would have to be given to that, then on the other hand we have been held ransom by Quebec for years reguarding transmission lines through quebec for future power, what has the Federal Government done about that. Its been an uphill battle for NL from day one.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Graham
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:42:13

    Funky Monkey, the same can be said about any other country/province where greed/corruption was involved. It still happens today in Ottawa, hence this entire discussion. I think many people here realize the POTENTIAL we have as a province to successfully go it alone especially given the higher transparency rate in politics 60 years on. But I suppose you think we'd still have the exact same political systems we and the rest of Canada had 60 years ago. Time to change your negative thinking my friend, and realize time would not have left us behind. Indeed we would have, like all other places, made progress in the advancement of our civlization. It's a very normal process which exists everywhere. Show me ONE place on this planet which has been perfect from the start. But if we had remained independent, I would LOVE to see where we'd be today. But I'm sure you'd think the crowd in Sin Jahn's would still be pulling the wool over the baymen's eyes and robbing them. Think again my friend. I'm quite sure things would not be as dire as you infer.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Graham
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:41:56

    Once a man is down, keep him down, has been the motto of the Feds against NL since NL joined confederation. If you look rationally at it, our years of high unemployment and transfer payments have been CAUSED by the rape of NL by Ottawa. Get rid of the resource-robbing parasite, ie Ottawa, and we'd rise to the occasion and prosper. We entered confederation with a SURPLUS despite having suffered massive manpower losses during our volunteer years fighting the wars in Europe. That says a lot. After confederation we've been kept in poverty. I wonder why that is ? No brainer - Ottawa. Some of you people do not know your NL history very well ( Nasty Nate ) and have put the cart before the horse. We've been robbed of much more than what we've ever received. If we had control of ALL our resources since confederation up to today, we'd have NEVER been on the Feds teet. The Feds have beaten us into submission and dependence - what countries do that today ? Unbelievable.


    We could separate and join a GRATEFUL country, or remain independent and after a few years develop our own industries, defence and infrastructure.


    We vote every few years to determine our leaders. Why not do the same every few years to see what the population says about our sovereignty ? Is it not even MORE important ?


    I SUPPORT SEPARATISM

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Funky
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:41:22

    What if this debate did go anywhere and Labrador, which is a very distinct part of the province and country, with it's own recognizable identity (as I have many friends from there and they consider themselves Labradorians and not Newfoundlanders) decided they wanted no part of separation from Canada and wanted to stay. It's about as possible as Newfoundland fighting for separation. If Labrador went it's own way, the province as we know it today would be ridiculously screwed. I don't think we recognize on the island how important (unbelievable importance the minieral and hydro assets) Labrador has meant to the rest of the province. In reality, we have been sucking Labrador dry of resources much the same way we b***h about the rest of Canada doing to our whole province.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Sandra
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:41:01

    Funkley Monkey needs to read this...

    http://www.heritage.nf.ca/law/econ_impacts.html

    ...to gain perspective on NL's surplus and the Commission of Gov't in NL's economy. (wake up call Funkey Monkey)

    I definitely support separatism, otherwise we will always been dumped on because we are nothings to Ottawa.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    AC
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:41:01

    And Sid, there's nothing stereotypical or ignorant about my original post. Those are the facts. The notion of separation from Canada is incredibly short-sighted and precisely the kind of knee-jerk reaction that has gotten us into bad situations in the past. Churchill Falls, anyone?

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Harper Fan
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:40:33

    I am a stauch Conservative. I believe that the Conservative Party is the best option we CURRENTLY have. But, if a sepratist party came along, I would offer to run for it in an election. We already have the NL First Party, but we need something with money, more candidates, and higher profiles.

    Men, hurrah for our own native Isle, Newfoundland,
    Not a stranger shall hold one inch of her strand;
    Her face turns to Britain, her Back to the Gulf,
    Come near at your peril, Canadian Wolf!

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    John
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:40:10

    Mr. Williams budget on ABC was 81K.
    Why those money were not used on better health care ?.

    I think AB is the the best motor of keeping Ottawa under control.

    This is because in Ottawa very few listen to NL.
    Sad but true.
    No party in Ottawa cares about NL.
    We are too small.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Ches
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:40:02

    Bravo Mr. Baker.

    Name the party and let's move.

    If we are to survive we must either:
    -regain control of our Grand Banks within Canada
    or
    -regain control of our Grand Banks outside of Canada.

    If we fail to achieve this, we are doomed to oblivion and desolation.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    James
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:39:57

    Nfl go for it, do not hold back, and you will never regreat it, we in scotland have been screwed thoughtless since 1745 by that shower down south,as much as we try we canna shake them off, there just like S##T to a blanket.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Frank
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:39:38

    Some posters have mentioned that lack of depth in leadership is a stumbling block to independence. The solution is education. It should be a priority for the province if it seriously decides to head down that road to independence.

    2049 seems like a good year to aim for.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    John
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:39:11

    Comments with a REAL name and address are worth reading; otherwise an anonymous opinion is truly worthless.

    What's everyone afraid of? Is bin Laden going to come after you?

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Jim B
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:39:10

    If Danny Williams said something like this, NLers would eat it up without thinking twice!

    Poor old George, no one takes him seriously. Ever.

    More seriously, comments such as these do cause one to question the calibre of individuals in the Senate (yesterday it was Mac Harb, calling for the abolishment of our seal hunt) and the fact that they really do not do much.

    Time to abolish the Senate.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Ex-Pat in Alberta
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:39:02

    Mr. Baker should watch himself I won't want him to lose his plum job that he was appointed to. Maybe a campain ploy for if they ever make the upper house an elected group.
    Seperation very interesting... Free Newfoundland!!!

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Josh
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:37:23

    FINALLY! someone said it! .... remember this is just a mention of separatism ... not a plan or a formal movement.... but at least the idea is finally getting out there! and he is not alone in thinking this!!! alot of young people agree and i cant wait for the movement to start and the day we leave this sorry excuse of a country! .... when the movement starts, all the information will be put out for everyone to see that we will be better off on our own and all we need is a person to start the ball rolling and present the situation .... a valid person that will organize it .... if only danny would start preacing it... who knows maybe he will in a few years ... cant wait for the day we take down the maple leaf that symbolizes opression of a people and the raping of resources ... and raise the flag of independence

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    A
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:37:14

    Congratulations to George Baker for calling it like it is, he's only telling the truth. My grandfather moved off the island about 50 years ago and it's becoming really tempting for me to move back to Newfoundland. Between economic success and a leadership that will actually fight for it's people. Don't let em kick you around, fight for what's yours.

    You could always end up like Nova Scotia, with a fiddling clown that sells us up river the first chance he gets.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Frank
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:37:05

    Interesting to read all the comments!

    I don,t think I would return to Newfoundland and Labrador and run for The New Newfoundland And Labrador Democratic Party with a vision like Gilles Duceppe to break this great country in pieces. I fought for years against the seperatist in Quebec with the Federal and Provincial Liberals.

    I think the ghosts of Pierre Trudeau, Joey Smallwood and Paul Martin would never let me rest in peace if I ever supported seperatist views.

    I think we should call this new wave of politics the DGGHS ..Danny, George,Gilles, Harper syndrome. They are so confused as to what they want for Canada.

    Frank Blackwood

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Ted
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:36:53

    I totally agree with AC from St. John's. This place wouldn't last 5 minutes alone. Who would lead us? Just think of the clowns we had as premiers since confederation? I can just imagine the amount of corruption that would have ensued, not to mention that which has already taken place. A few oils bucks roll in and everyone get suddenly becomes patriotic and cocky by the rhetoric of a few pension seeking politicians whose only qualification is that they happened to have been the local school principal or hockey coach. Yeah, now there's something you can build a nation upon.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Lloyd
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:35:59

    There have been moments I've been a fan of Mr. Baker. Some moments.

    Judging by commentary on the local call in shows (callers and certain host(s), perhaps even some government people, and even one or two comments here, I'd say he will help garner a little support for the idea in Newfoundland. Seems there is such a party in existence ready to serve that purpose?

    In Labrador, though, we have a little different problem. Our problem has been in getting fair treatment from the provincial government rather than from the Feds. Unlike the provincial government, we have no constitutionally guaranteed rights regarding resource extraction, disposition, or just returns, nor do we have any really say in the matter on how to rectify those issues so far.
    In 1948 Labradorians voted overwhelmingly at 80 plus percent to join Canada. If that number has changed, I'd say it has been upward.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Frank
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:35:39

    This a cheap shot from George Baker who got brushed under the carpet some years ago because of his unrealistic visions. He articulates very well on what others think is best for Newfoundland and Labrador, not what George really has in mind.

    To talk about seperating from Canada is one of the most immature and unrealistic gestures a well respected politicians like George Baker could make. This would be like removing the bedrock of the Atlantic ocean, and letting the island of Newfoundland and Labrador sink beneath.

    You see, George can make remarks like this today as noone will sweep him under the carpet tomorrow. Newfoundlanders will never walk away from Canada

    Frank Blackwood

    **Formerly of Wesleyville.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    John
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:34:06

    Funy Monkey. The War created the surplus. It was not the Commission of Government. Don't you know that? And Newfoundland lost it independence NOT because of debt but because of ASSETS. The British wanted to control Newfoundland outright because of its war time value. We did not LOSE independence. It was STOLEN from us.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Nasty
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:32:12

    Just a few simple questions and comments for Mr. Baker.

    You will be out your job since your services will no longer be required if Newfoundland was not a province or a part of Canada. Talk about shooting oneself in the proverbial foot.

    Just where is the province going to go? Who will we join to survive in the global scheme of things, Russia, Cuba? Where is our army, navy and air force to defend from the evil Canada and USA?

    What will be done to sustain the population? We know that we are not able to provide for ourselves due to location. We have no industry to provide an export commodity demanded by world markets.

    So, just where is this plan of yours or did Fabian Manning put you up to this on Dannys behalf?

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Tim
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:31:44

    Hey Sid, bet you can not wait for your GST cheques and tax returns. Oh thats right you are not part of Canada and do not want that anymore. Good for you. You are helping with our National Debt for not accepting the benefits that are given to all Canadians.

    Guess you will need a passport, work permit and VISA to enter Canada for work that you can not nor will not be able to obtain here then too :)

    Thought so. Lot more to this then you might think.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Sean
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:31:33

    I'm with Baker and alot of fellow Newfoundlanders , lets get out of this crazy country we call Canada, I had to move away with my family years ago to support my family, do you think it's a better life up here than it is back home...NO it's not

    I say it's time to seperate and drop Harper like a bad habit, who needs him, Surely we would be better off on our own that we are curently. Count me in for walking in downtown Toronto holding a NL to seperate sign any day.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    AC
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:31:32

    Pretty embarrassing comments from Georgie here. How quickly we forget how long we, as a province, sucked the Federal government's teet--highest unemployment rate in the country, abnormally high welfare (or whatever the politically correct term is these days) rate, not to mention the endless years of receiving transfer payments as have-not province. Now that we are finally generating some revenue on our own, we have this blow-hard making us look like a bunch of ungrateful fools. Not to mention Danny running his mouth every chance he gets. We took and took and took for decades while other provinces gave. Now it's our turn the return the favour. Deal with it.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Funky
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:31:17

    My facts are real because I say they are.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    NL_Expatriate
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:31:11

    Inform yourself
    Royal Commission on Newfoundland and Labrador's place in canada.
    http://www.exec.gov.nl.ca/royalcomm/

    Report on negotiations duress, conflict of interest leading up to Upper Churchill contract.
    http://www.ucs.mun.ca/~feehan/CF.pdf

    Quebec gets 2 Billion a year from Upper Churchill.
    http://www.thetelegram.com/index.cfm?sid=219507&sc=79

    Short history on Equalization/Atlantic Accord
    http://www.irpp.org/po/archive/mar07/courchene.pdf

    Great summary of Atlantic Accord/Equalization links.
    http://www.rantandroar.ca/accord.htm

    Video presentation on automatic extension renewal clause for Upper Churchill.
    http://www.mun.ca/harriscentre/Memorial_Presents/Churchill_Falls/churchill_falls_video.php

    Independent cost benefit analysis
    http://www.theindependent.ca/pdf/Cost_benefit_methodology.pdf

    This is just a primer it doesn't touch on many many other burning issues.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Funky
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:30:54

    Graham? Are you serious? Your telling other people they know little about NL history?

    I think you need to brush up a little my friend. Newfoundland was always destitute. Yeah, we had a surplus when we joined confederation...sure. That's corrrect. But that came after years of commission of govt rule where we had an unelected group of indivduals running the country (mainly British citizens). Before the commission of govt was created (to give us a break from our own politicians) NL was basically bankrupt. We were screwed because of the greed and careless leadership we had in the country before that. Newfoundland was a sinking ship. Instead of a ruling class in Ottawa, we had a ruling class in St. John's which raped the rest of the provnice for their own benefit and the benefit of the capital city region (sound familiar?). There were no good times in NL my friend. Learn your own history before you start bashing the understanding of others.

    When people voted...outside of St. John's they voted overwhelmingly in favour of confederation. The only real opposition to confederation was in the St. John's area where those previously in power were afraid they were about to lose all their control. People voted in favour of confederation outside of St. John's because the leadership of Canada couldn't be any worse then the leadership of the ruling class in St. John's.

    If Newfoundland was meant to be a country, it would still be one. This separatism debate is a joke.

    And whoever mentioned the NLFirst Party should take a look at their webpage and actually listen to them. They're a group of clowns.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    What a
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:29:47

    So here is a little food for thought. For those that think you will be better off as a country on our own, answer these simple questions. Where are the practical jobs in this province? Why is it that this province boasts the highest unemployment rates in Canada when it has been considered to be a have province? Where are the sustainable jobs that were promised with the stimulus plans from both Danny and Stevie?

    Who are you going to sell iron ore to if the steel mills and auto plants are shutting down?
    Are we ready to pay higher tariffs on imports and exports to get our way?

    Lots of talk, but like normal no real plan or action from anyone to make anything more then a fuss over nothing.

    I would really like to see someone put out a little more then lip service for a change. People have offered to create employment in this province, yet the status quo remains where those given the grants and funding to do so use the lions share to fill their personal pockets with little thought to the rest of the people that need to survive.

    Once you get a plan and your act together the rest of the world just might take you seriously for a change. Till that time comes we will continue to live in poverty.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Winston
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:29:38

    Iggy is finally right about something: this is ridiculous.

    What a fascinatingly disingenuous distinction Baker is trying to make: predicting something is the opposite of promoting it.

    Like someone else we all know, he wants to save Canada by discussing its breakup. Baker wants to promote Canadian unity so much that he must go on every media outlet in the entire country talking manically about separatism.

    The lavish media attention must be a real Lenten sacrifice for the good Senator.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    danny
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:29:27

    It is about time Newfoundlander's hear the truth about the discrimination bias diffarances concerning our well being. I have lived in almost every province, I have been asked for my visa by a government official, this its self tells me that our government had no interest in our province until they realized that we had enough natural resources that they could squander like our electricity, I think if one province could threaten to go it on their own, why do we accept our leader wanting to remove one of our own from government, other people seem to be aloud to speak out but when we do Stephen Harper want to shut us up, we worked hard to build this country and now we are being ripped of again. I have talked to many Newfoundlander's who thinks this would be the best for our province. then and only then we could be self sufficient, I have thrown this idea out to other countries that are interested in our resources. The Chinese, Europe, Indians, all have interest in our wealth and kindness. If our own government can't accept us for who we are well it is probably time we think of our own and separate from those who rob us and treat us different than the rest of Canada. Not everyone have seen this, it has only been since the internet came available to Newfoundlander and its people that we have a voice. If the government had it their way we would be shut out of every decision made in parliament. Danny Williams is like a god to us he is the only politician who speaks the truth, if we loose Danny our government will try and sell us out again, another thing the U.S.A. have hard liners who work with the federal politicians to buy up our oil, electricity an any thing they could get their hands on, we fought in a war against the enemy, so what makes us cowards when it comes to separation issues, We need to stand behind Danny Williams and his agenda to have a voice on the world market and it's decisions.. Yours Truly Daniel T. Duke Thursday March 5th. 2009 WE DO HAVE A VOICE SO STAND UP AND MAKE YOUR VOICE HEARD!!!!!

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Saucy Face
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:28:58

    Vive Terra Nouveau Libre ... Or something like that:)

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    mercedes
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:28:40

    This is the foolishest thing I've ever heard! Don't you realize that if we separated we would have to take Mr. williams along as king? He'd have even more power then! Power to stomp on anyone who is not his buddy! At least now we have token protection from the federal party becausy of that sad and haunting word; democracy!

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Stewart
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:28:16

    Plain and simple, Canada is the greatest country on earth. I am a proud citizen of Canada and a proud Newfoundlander, but talk of a separatist movement is ludicrous.
    Yes, fight for what is ours but remember we are a part of a bigger family that allows us to freely express our concerns and live in peace.
    I think the benefits of living in this country far outweigh the negatives.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    John
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:27:10

    This Newfoundlander living away from home says George Baker has it spot-on.

    The NEWFOUNDLAND BLOC in Ottawa is an excellent idea whose time has definitely come. As things stand today, the tenth province will never be treated fairly in this federation.

    It should be obvious to everyone that the louder the Quebec nationalists and separatists shout, the better they get treated by Ottawa.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Shannon
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:26:24

    This talk is absolute nonsense. Danny Williams has really got people believing that Ottawa is the Evil Empire.

    I am no fan of Harper, and even less a fan of D.W. The former's tenure won't last much longer in its MINORITY state. When Iggy and Danny band together, quite possibly when Ig becomes PM, will George Baker - who's just looking for some attention again - and the rest of you separatists be crying to leave Canada, big bad evil Canada??

    Why doesn't George direct some of his vitriol towards Williams, architect of the ABC Campaign which saw us lose over a BILLION and a half dollars??

    Get a grip, folks. This misguided passion makes everything that much more appalling and ridiculous.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Cindy
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:25:42

    Ottawa has never had respect for the people of NL (Newfoundland AND Labrador). Even after we sent all our men and boys to fight and die for Canada in the 2nd world war, which left our society in near ruins post war. Was this not the key factor in NL joining Canada initially? The losses we endured due to the war? Our population was devastated and as such, pinned all the hopes of a brighter and more prosperous future on Joey Smallwood's claim to a greater life through Confederation? What was there to think about back then? ...If we join Canada maybe we can eat 7 days a week! Well, it hasn't worked out to be that great a life because of confederation now has it? What do you think would have happened if NL had been in a healthier financial place post WW2? Joey Smallwood would have been KING!

    Let's see how much better off NL is after confederation...I will need your help...

    Please list 10 Great things NL has benefited from directly BECAUSE of confederation...

    1.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    dennis
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:25:42

    Interesting topic this, full of emotion. Can anyone actually put some numbers behind the claims that Canada has robbed Newfoundland of it wealth? If one were to total up how much went out and how much came in, who would win and who would lose.
    But, the question is, could Newfoundland go it alone? It has a moderate amount of natural resourses, but nothing that makes me think that a country could be run on it. Outside of that there is really very little industry and manufacturing, almost no agriculture, no banking, a very, very small tourist industry, a fishery that is in shambles, a small population spread out over a very big area, and a reasonably high debt. To argue that it has a great geographical location is a bit on the bizarre side. It is a big island stuck out in the middle of the North Atlantic with arguably some of the worst weather in the world. Beautiful, I admit, but all planes to North America fly over, the vast majority of ships pass right on by, and mostly people crossing the gulf are returning home for holidays. This hardly speaks of a great geographical location that is of enormous interest to, say the European Union as some have pointed out.

    It seems to me then, that the real issue is why Newfoundland politicians have so little influence in Ottawa. Obviously with a demographic model for determining numbers of MP's Newfoundland will not have many, but can they be more effective? Perhaps electing people who have strength of character and ideas that go beyond threatening to leave when things aren't going their way might be helpful.

    I shall look up the Newfoundland First - or whatever it is called. Sounds like fun.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    On My Way
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:25:25

    Count me down as a separtist...that is...If this BlocNL BS progresses and a separtist movement becomes more mainstream in NL, my family will be separating from NL - permanantly.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Funky
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:24:37

    Spouting the same nonsense over and over again doesn't make it come true, no matter how much you want it too and no matter how much it helps your feeble argument.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    NL_Expatriate
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:24:14

    The Supreme Court of Canada basically said that the 'only' reason the off-shore could be considered to be owned by Canada is because of third-party international law. The court actually said that the status of these resources is very much in the hands of NL. They demonstrated their meaning by saying, and I paraphrase, 'not-with-standing international laws, NL brought those resources into Canada, and NL can take them back out'.

    So in response to this the Atlantic Accord compromise was reached. In that deal the rest of Canada gets to suck the teat of yet more of our resources. Harper has twice unilaterally violated that compromise agreement in order to suck a little more out of NL's share. Talk about bumming off the poor!

    It's our cake why shouldn't we be allowed to eat it?
    To expand on the simplistic cake/Grand Banks resources metaphor.

    Inform yourself
    Royal Commission on Newfoundland and Labrador's place in canada.
    http://www.exec.gov.nl.ca/royalcomm/

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Looking
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:24:10

    Still see no answers to the questions. Where are the jobs, where is the exports, where are the buyers? Who is going to pay for this dream?

    Where is the plan? All talk no action. Thats been and will continue to be the problem here till we get our acts together.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Lloyd
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:22:58

    Paul from StJohns writes:
    As for Labrador, most people there are transplanted islanders anyway. The reason there is development there is due to the people who moved up there and did it, and they are basically the same people who live on the island. unquote.

    Most people? Nearly half the people the people in Labrador are Aboriginals.
    Many of the people are descended from people who came here directly from Europe and other parts of what is now Canada. Many, not most, or their original families are are from Newfoundland. Most of them now consider Labrador their home and native land. From my own experience and observation, many if not most of them realize the unfair treatment at the hands of the provincial government.
    Most people also realize that the LACK of development here is because WE don't get to make our own developmental decisions and suffer the losses because most of OUR resources have gone to benefit others - at the HAND of the PROVINCIAL government who has constitutional control of all land based resources.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Jack
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:22:55

    What an insult to Canadians. Here is a Canadian Senator appointed to such a prestigious position advocating for separation! Go back to the open line shows and getting people riled up over the price of turnips. On the way out leave your Canadian senator salary and pension.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Townie
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:22:53

    I'm behind you all the way George baker seperate the Canadian Government screwed us enough the republic of Nf Priminster Danny all the way.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Truman
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:22:45

    no surplus now funkey monkey or whatever your foolish name is

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    kirby
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:22:14

    i see this as something akin to a chest found in an attic...a BOX if you please...and many 'newfoundlings' are overjoyed at the prospects it may hold.
    as a labrador native,i am not anxious,because we know what is in the box for our Native Peoples...ORIGINAL JURISDICTION is just one issue that springs to mind.
    open it up...'newly founde'...landers.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Mike
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:21:47

    If you were taking a poll of the comments above - 16 comments for / 17 comments against at this point (approx. 50% for / 50% against).

    I do believe there is a growing sentiment towards our place in Canada - now whether that justifies a separatist movement - time will tell.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Dumbfounded
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:21:32

    Who is this idiot AC ?? Honestly do you really believe what your saying. Unreal the stupidity that writes on this forum.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    AC
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:21:27

    Jimmy, Alberta was generally against Federal 'intereference' long before the profits of the oilsands, back to when agriculture was their primary revenue source. Even during their most difficult times, during the oil collapse of the early 1980s, they still only hit 10% unemployment, and as a province have not received anywhere close to the amount of Federal money that Newfoundland has over the decades. It's not uncommon at all for profitable businesses to detest the Government due to regulation and taxation. My point is that Newfoundland has taken far too much to be suddenly spewing separation rhetoric now that we have had a couple of prosperous years.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    John
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:19:22

    George Baker is a fool,what more than that can I say.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Funky
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:19:03

    John...if I tell people my name, people will know who I am.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Mike
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:18:52

    Baker refers to Harpers vendetta against the province but strained relations with Ottawa are nothing new regardless of which party is in power. If we, or any other province, wanted to take our ball and go home every time we felt the game was being played unfairly, Canada would not exist. But Canada does exist warts and all.

    Every province has a beef with the Federal government. However, not every province wants to go it alone. Sure there are fringe elements whose sole purpose is to separate but they are viewed with contempt or indifference. The Bloc Quebecois is as good example as any.

    But Canada is a democracy and people are free to express their opinions just as George Baker has done. We can include comments from Mike Duffy, Globe and Mail editorials and infamous newfie jokes. People can say what they wish. Its a free country. But we are just as free to agree or disagree with what they say and freely express our opinions without fear of retribution.

    Eventually Harper will be gone as Prime Minister, but problems with Ottawa will remain. Our relationship is tenuous at best and in all likelihood, will continue to be that way. But that doesnt mean we have to pack up house and leave. We offer a lot to the country, and it offers a lot to us. And as proud as we are to call ourselves Newfoundlanders, we should be just as proud to call ourselves Canadians.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Frank
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:17:36

    I have to agree with Neil from Newfoundland. George Baker doesn,t speak for all Newfoundlanders.

    He likes to stir up a lot of dust like a crackie having a dump on a sandpile and then runs back home with his tail between the hind legs ,begging for a reward as it didn,t pee on the carpet.

    I don't think George will have the support of our younger politicians in Ottawa today.
    Frank Blackwood

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    AC
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:17:17

    This will be my last post on this thread, just wanted to respond to some of the laughable claims about not knowing history. We may have entered into Confederation in 1949 with a surplus, but what didn't we have? Well, let's see... 50% of the population had no electricity. No connecting highway system. No child allowances, extremely high unemployment, poor health care and virtually no social assistance programs. It's a give and take scenario. They benefitted from our natural resources and we benefitted from their infrastructure improvements and social programs. It's easy to blame Ottawa for everything, but if we'd had one or two even HALF capable premiers over the years, who knows where we'd be?

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Cathy
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:16:13

    In the 60 years since confederation, despite having lost most of our men during the wars, we still had a surplus like another commenter mentioned. If we had stayed independent, we would have developed all of our own infrastructure WITHOUT outside so-called help. To AC, around confederation (1949 just after WW2), the whole world had high unemployment, basically NO social assistance programs and poor health care. As a matter of fact, in case you haven't noticed, we STILL have poor health care, poor social assistance programs and moderately high unemployment, and we're now set to lose even more thanks to the hostililty of our Prime Minister towards us. If we had control over our own resources, we would have been much further ahead than we are right now. Try and refute that. Talk sense man.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Jimmy
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:16:09

    To AC from St. John's: Point taken. Perhaps I should take a closer look at Canadian history.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Barry
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:15:43

    Robert if you dont like it move to Quebec you would fit right in. thats Dannys next plan. He will become emperor of Quebec and Newfoundland.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Mark
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:15:39

    Cathy - 'we would have developed all of our own infrastructure'?

    With what? Seriously - every bit of infrastructure was built by the British who were broke and tired of paying for us, and in later years by the temporary military presence. After Confederation, billions flowed from Ottawa to get our roads, schools and hospitals up to snuff. Without this money, dear Cathy, please tell me who the heck would have built our infrastruture? The fish merchants? Not bloody likely.

    Are there problems in our federation? Absolutely. But anyone who believes Newfoundland would have been better off on its own after 1949 needs to see a doctor.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Tony
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:15:30

    Seems like George has hurt Canada's feelings.

    I'm surprised that it has taken this long for someone in his position to say it since he's only saying what most here are thinking anyway. AND yes all you lCanada lovers, I feel that I am speaking for the very patient and silent majority within Newfoundland and Labrador. It's time for all of us to reconsider this so called democracy called Canada.

    Good for you George. Nice to see someone here who's not afraid to speak the truth. Time for others to follow his lead.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Common Sense
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:15:09

    For those of you who believe NL would be better off as its own state, let me just say two things

    1 - MHA Spending Scandal - you think that was bad, imagine what would it be like then, you would have every politician scrambling to steal every dollar they could get their hands on

    2 - Crap Health System becomes even crappier.

    Yeah, go separatism!!!! Whatever.

    Nuff Said

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Paul
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:15:07

    Great to see how many people have had enough and really look at separation as a viable option. Too bad people like AC don't know anything about history. He says we've received so much, but fails to understand that we have given more than we've ever received and that continues today.

    As for others who wonder who we will link up with, the answer in no one. We'll be fine by ourselves.

    As for Labrador, most people there are transplanted islanders anyway. The reason there is development there is due to the people who moved up there and did it, and they are basically the same people who live on the island. It's just a bit hard to provide the infrastructure to such a large place with such a small population. But it seems to progressing gradually as I've seen in my time up there recently. If we had been our own country I don't think Labrador would now be underdeveloped. We'd have loads of Upper Churchill bucks, would be shipping out steel or cars, not raw ore, fueled by Churchill power, access to forests able to be provided. The fact that the entire province has been impoverished by Canada means it's hard to provide proper service easily and the smaller and more distant populations are more likely to suffer most. But we still need to stick together.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Jesse
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:14:55

    As a Labradorian, I find Newfoundland Separatism funny. Possibly because of the assumption that Labradorians would want to go too.

    And the kvetching about the federal government doing things to Newfoundland, and ignoring that the provincial government does the same to Labrador. Like the plan to ignore every single community on the coast of Labrador should the Lower Churchill project ever finish and the power routed to the island. And the hand wringing over how running those power lines through a precious park in Newfoundland will destroy its scenic beauty (while ignoring what it will do to the landscape of Labrador).

    Those who live in glass houses with bongs lying around shouldn't whine about their neighbour's drinking habits.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Gerry
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:14:42

    I have to laugh about the PC member getting offended by George Baker , and wanting him fired , and saying we cant form a seperatist group, what does he think Quebec is??? This is the only country in the world that would allow a sitting party whose soul purpose is to seperate and their own interest looked after,anywhere else they would be outlawed.In the meen time George Baker is right ,i'am teaching my son about politics and how we've been treated by Ottawa, If i had my way we would leave now , Think the USA wouldn't want us?? We've been held down long enough Stevie!!!

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Jimmy
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:14:40

    To AC from St. John's: Look at your Canadian history. Alberta was once a have-not province. And see how quickly they tried to turn on Confederation when the oil sands money started to pad the accounts. Even the current prime minister once advocated a 'firewall' to isolate Alberta from the rest of Canada.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    NL_Expatriate
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:14:27

    Equality or Exit!

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Willy
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:13:56

    I'm a bit surprised by Sean Hurleys comment about it being a better life in NL than he's able to find in Brampton . Would you rather have your family on Pogey, or maybe you miss your Skidoo or the Quad . Maybe you miss loafing around on the Wharf with your hands in your pockets complaining why your cheque isn't in the mail yet . My friend , that's your opinion and you're entitled to it , but don't include me and the thousands of others who left for a better life . I wouldn't trade my position for anything . Yep , i retired at 55 and still live in Ontario . I've got what i need and am satisfied .

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    2cents
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:13:55

    Sepratisim is always in the back of many people's heads here in this province. I myself would support a sepratist party. Why is it ok for Quebec to have a Bloc Quebcois but not Newfoundland and Labrador? Frankly I am sick and tired of the double standards that the present ruling federal party hold so near and dear.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Roxanne
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:13:30

    I am ashamed to be a Canadian living in Newfoundland, I would rather be called an American, even when the likes of Bush was President.

    Our only hope is we take some stand and maybe Baker is right, a NL Bloc may be the way to go. I would gladly give up my $30 GST to have my Newfoundland dignity back.

    George Baker, if you want to do this I think you will have a following, and a huge one. We are tired of being the laughing stock of Canada.

    Lets see whose resources would suffer the most if we pulled out of Canada.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Michael
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:13:25

    Just because we would not be a part of Canada does not mean that we would have to be desolate. Due to our resources, econemy and geographic location we would be very attractive to the European Union and the U.S.

    We will never be treated like equals in Canada because we don't have enough votes and we don't share the same needs as the majority of Canadian provinces. To stay in power, politicians need to please the majority. Unfortunately, we will never be the majority.

    Submit a comment

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts
loading...

Tely Twitter

Advertising