• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (12)
  •  

Owners hopeful downed soccer facility will rise again


Published on January 15, 2009
Staff ~ The Telegram

Comments

  • Username
    Leslie
    - July 2, 2010 at 15:05:02

    Worst kind.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Tim
    - July 2, 2010 at 15:00:39

    By not being on the site, but from many years investigating events such as this, a recomendation for future consideration would be with the plates at the foundation. The sheared off bolts seem to be poorly thought out for any potential laterial loading.

    This event could have taken place once the structure was completed and in use. We should consider it a lucky turn of events that this happened prior to operation and any occupation.

    I use larger mounting bolts on a wind turbine. It is better to be safe then sorry.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Barb
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:59:24

    It's too bad about the wind damage, but its an ill wind that don't blow somebody some good. Profits will have to take second spot for the uninterrupted view of the lake for a little while.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Hank
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:55:11

    Who's the engineering firm responsible for this climatic oversight.

    More experts and less professionals please.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    David
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:49:32

    Perhaps others, as I do, remember a humorous Mordillo poster from the 1980s.....a rectangular island with steep cliffs, a soccer pitch laid out on top, and the ball floating in the ocean below.

    Classic!

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Former Newfoundlander
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:46:53

    It has to do with the erection process,
    knowing high winds were expected
    temp. bracing should of been welded
    in a manner that would withstand the wind loads. (A steel structure is not a turbine and does not require the big bolts as per the last comment. Could of had 5 DIA bolts the same thing would of happen.) This happens more than people think, unfortunate but it happens.
    I am no engineer either,but from working with structural steel it was human over sight and timing with the mother nature fury of wind. The sturture is design to act as a diaphram in this case the diaphram was not complete.

    Just a rookie's opinion!

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Leslie
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:54:51

    Worst kind.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Tim
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:48:38

    By not being on the site, but from many years investigating events such as this, a recomendation for future consideration would be with the plates at the foundation. The sheared off bolts seem to be poorly thought out for any potential laterial loading.

    This event could have taken place once the structure was completed and in use. We should consider it a lucky turn of events that this happened prior to operation and any occupation.

    I use larger mounting bolts on a wind turbine. It is better to be safe then sorry.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Barb
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:46:52

    It's too bad about the wind damage, but its an ill wind that don't blow somebody some good. Profits will have to take second spot for the uninterrupted view of the lake for a little while.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Hank
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:41:17

    Who's the engineering firm responsible for this climatic oversight.

    More experts and less professionals please.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    David
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:31:38

    Perhaps others, as I do, remember a humorous Mordillo poster from the 1980s.....a rectangular island with steep cliffs, a soccer pitch laid out on top, and the ball floating in the ocean below.

    Classic!

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Former Newfoundlander
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:27:07

    It has to do with the erection process,
    knowing high winds were expected
    temp. bracing should of been welded
    in a manner that would withstand the wind loads. (A steel structure is not a turbine and does not require the big bolts as per the last comment. Could of had 5 DIA bolts the same thing would of happen.) This happens more than people think, unfortunate but it happens.
    I am no engineer either,but from working with structural steel it was human over sight and timing with the mother nature fury of wind. The sturture is design to act as a diaphram in this case the diaphram was not complete.

    Just a rookie's opinion!

    Submit a comment

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

More

SmartEdition logo smart

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts
loading...

Tely Twitter

Advertising