 |






 |
|
PHOTO & SLIDESHOW GALLERIES
|
|
|
|






|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
| Last updated at 10:48 AM on 17/11/09 |
Cancer Society supports light cigarette class-action case 
The Telegram
The Canadian Cancer Society is supporting a court appeal this week that will attempt to start a class action over light cigarettes.
In a news release, the society said the Sparkes case proceeding as a class action would provide “necessary access to justice.”
Without class-action certification, thousands of consumers in the province would have no practical remedy “as a result of the ‘light’ and ‘mild’ deception,” the society said.
The case returns to court Wednesday and Thursday, when the Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal will begin hearing arguments as to whether a lawsuit against Imperial Tobacco for deception related to so-called “light” cigarettes should be certified to proceed as a class action.
In 2008, the Trial Division of the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador ruled the case could not proceed as a class action because the cigarettes weren’t purchased directly from the manufacturer.
Ches Crosbie is the lawyer representing the plaintiffs.
The society said in British Columbia, in a case similar to Sparkes, the Knight v. Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd. case has been certified to proceed as a class action. In Quebec, there are two broad product liability class actions that have been certified to proceed against Imperial Tobacco and the two other major tobacco companies.
The cancer society also noted that in a 2002 judgment upholding federal advertising restrictions, the Quebec Superior Court concluded “the industry has always known that light cigarettes are as damaging to health as regular cigarettes but has nevertheless mounted a subtle marketing plan that leads smokers to infer they should smoke light cigarettes if they are concerned about their health.”
Imperial Tobacco and other major tobacco companies removed “light” and “mild” descriptors because of a 2006 settlement with the federal Competition Bureau. But, the Cancer Society remains concerned that tobacco companies continue to engage in package deception that misleads consumers.
Nine provinces have also brought forward legislation to recover Medicare costs related to smoking, while three provincial governments — B.C., Ontario and New Brunswick — have filed lawsuits.
This province has legislation introduced but not yet proclaimed.
telegram@thetelegram.com
|
17/11/09
|
Comments: |
|
This Conversation is Moderated. What is moderation?
|
| What does moderation mean? |
 |
The Telegram is committed to encouraging intelligent discourse among our readers and to creating a forum where diverse views and opinions on a wide range of topics can be aired. The forum you are in now is a result of our continuing efforts to facilitate a dynamic online conversation among our readers.
This is a moderated conversation. Once a reader follows the steps to register and submit his or her comment it goes to a moderator for the website. Once it has been approved, your comment will be displayed on the website. A comment may be edited or deleted for reasons of content or language.
All readers wishing to join a conversation must first sign in and agree to the Terms of Usage, which explain the rules of acceptable content.
|
|
|
(Post a comment)
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Angela Shortall from St.Johns, NL writes: A cigeratte is a cigarette. Regardless of light or mild people know they are all bad for you. To be tying up with courts with this garbage is ridiculous.
|
| Posted 17/11/2009 at 11:15 AM | Alert an Editor | Link to comment |
| ALERT US ABOUT THIS COMMENT |
 |
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
|
|
|
|
puffpuffpass31 from St.Johns, NL writes: I totally agree with u Angela..i am a smoker myself(trying to quit)...and I knows that either it be a regular or a light, neither of them are any good for you, As I see it, most people smoke due to their own reasons, the only thing i wish i could take back is lighting that first cigarette, I would not be going through the hardship of quitting right now, but i can't blame no one but myself..I take responsibility for my own stupid actions:-(, yes i could be one of those people that blame the big cigarette companies, but they are not the ones that put it in my mouth and lit the lighter....oh I wish some people take on their own responsibilities. Its like telling an alcoholic to water down his drink because its better for you...sheesh!
|
| Posted 17/11/2009 at 8:45 PM | Alert an Editor | Link to comment |
| ALERT US ABOUT THIS COMMENT |
 |
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
|
|
|
|
lynda duguay from ontario writes: Aren't you glad your donations are going towards the lawyers & things like this? The case isn't about solving cancer, yet this is the reason for people donating to them. This spending on the hate of smokers is why I don't donate to this non governmental group.
|
| Posted 19/11/2009 at 5:32 AM | Alert an Editor | Link to comment |
| ALERT US ABOUT THIS COMMENT |
 |
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
|
|
|
NOTE
The management of this site emphasizes that it is in no way liable for persons, physical or legal, who are hosted here. Moreover, the managers of this site may not be held liable for errors and omissions that may slip into the information displayed in these reader comments. Everyone who submits a comment should read, understand and agree to the Terms of Usage for this section.
|
|
|
|
|
|