 |






 |
|
PHOTO & SLIDESHOW GALLERIES
|
|
|
|






|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
| Last updated at 8:37 AM on 21/11/09 |
|
The Atlantic premiers pose outside of the Churchill Falls generating station after wrapping up their meeting Friday. From left are P.E.I. Premier Robert Ghiz, Nova Scotia Premier Darrell Dexter, Newfoundland and Labrador Premier Danny Williams and New Brunswick Premier Shawn Graham. - Submitted photo. |
|
|
Williams, Graham agree to disagree on NB Power sale 
Politics/Energy
DAVE BARTLETT The Telegram and The Canadian Press
Premier Danny Williams says the Atlantic premiers had a frank and open discussion about the sale of NB Power to Hydro-Quebec, but neither he nor New Brunswick Premier Shawn Graham have changed their positions.
"We certainly agreed to disagree," Williams told The Telegram Friday. "There's no change in positions from our particular perspective."
Last month, Graham announced his province had reached an agreement to sell most of NB Power's assets, including generating stations and the transmission grid, to the Quebec utility.
Williams responded by accusing Hydro-Quebec of trying to get a stranglehold on access to the hungry New England energy market.
He also called out Graham for entering into a side deal with Quebec in the middle of talks between all four Atlantic provinces on energy co-operation.
After a meeting of the regional premiers at Churchill Falls concluded Friday, Williams softened his tone somewhat.
"The premiers are good friends so this wasn't an exercise in taking Shawn Graham, or any of the other premiers, up to Churchill Falls and beating up on them," he said.
He called the discussion cordial, where all sides got to air their concerns.
Williams said his beef has always been with Hydro-Quebec, not New Brunswick.
"Ultimately, that deal is for the government of New Brunswick and the people of New Brunswick to decide," Williams said.
"Our issues are with Hydro-Quebec and the previous patterns of behaviour of that company and what they've done to us as a government and as a people."
The premier said he respected Graham's position even though he disagrees with it.
"They're going to do what they are going to do and they do it at their own peril."
Williams said Nova Scotia Premier Darrell Dexter shares his concern about the deal, when it comes to gaining access to power customers in the Northeastern United States.
N.L., N.S., looking for guarantee
Both asked Graham at the meetings for a guarantee on access before the Hydro-Quebec deal is finalized by the end of March.
"We don't want to wait until April Fool's, when this deal goes through, and we find that we're now dealing with Hydro-Quebec and we're into the same tangle ... with the way they are handling the regulatory process in Quebec," said Williams.
"Give us guaranteed access so that we know that we're going to be able to get through and we're not going to be subject of the whims and fancies of Quebec."
Graham, however wouldn't commit to such an agreement.
"Today under the federal Energy Regulatory Commission, to be able to sell power into the United States, you have to have an open market system," he said.
"Today if the province of Newfoundland wants to look at a new transmission corridor through New Brunswick, that can still happen. Under these market rules, if there is any surplus power on that transmission grid, then it would have to go up for public auction and any jurisdiction could bid on it."
As for a suggestion that this province try to match Hydro-Quebec's bid for NB Power, Williams said the utility should remain owned by New Brunswick.
"We're simply not interested in going there because we don't think it's the right thing or the principled thing to do," Williams said.
dbartlett@thetelegram.com
|
21/11/09
© 2009
|
Comments: |
|
This Conversation is Moderated. What is moderation?
|
| What does moderation mean? |
 |
The Telegram is committed to encouraging intelligent discourse among our readers and to creating a forum where diverse views and opinions on a wide range of topics can be aired. The forum you are in now is a result of our continuing efforts to facilitate a dynamic online conversation among our readers.
This is a moderated conversation. Once a reader follows the steps to register and submit his or her comment it goes to a moderator for the website. Once it has been approved, your comment will be displayed on the website. A comment may be edited or deleted for reasons of content or language.
All readers wishing to join a conversation must first sign in and agree to the Terms of Usage, which explain the rules of acceptable content.
|
|
|
(Post a comment)
|
 |
 |
 |
NL_Expatriate@yahoo.ca from Upalong writes: Yep; irreconcilable differences with the goals of all of the national parties due to the Per capita Colonial set up of this federation. So lets agree to disagree and move on?
Equality or Exit.
|
| Posted 21/11/2009 at 3:04 PM | Alert an Editor | Link to comment |
| ALERT US ABOUT THIS COMMENT |
 |
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
|
|
|
|
dogloc l from st kitts, on writes: It is time for the federal government fix this problem.The federal government will allow The U.S. to put a pipeline through Canada for oil from Alaska to the U.S. but won't allow Nfld & Lab.to export its hydro through Canada to the U.S. or to Ontario.The intention of confederation was to work together as one country,not for one big province to try to control the smaller provinces.It seems as though neither the Liberals,Tories or the NDP have the guts to bring this forward in the House for fear of losing votes in Quebec.
|
| Posted 21/11/2009 at 5:46 PM | Alert an Editor | Link to comment |
| ALERT US ABOUT THIS COMMENT |
 |
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
|
|
|
Wallace from NB writes: What is the open grid concept? If Nfld Hydro goes into NB and buys a right-of-way from individual land owners, would they not be able to use it for their own use exclusively, but being able to sell excess capacity on it to NB Power, NS Power, Hydro Quebec or who-ever, if they wish?
For that matter, is NL Hydro forbidden, by the same token of building their own transmission line through the province of Quebec?
Just asking.
|
| Posted 21/11/2009 at 6:41 PM | Alert an Editor | Link to comment |
| ALERT US ABOUT THIS COMMENT |
 |
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
|
|
|
Wallace from NB writes: WOW ! Premier Danny Williams looks a lot less formidable
when pictured beside his fellow premiers. His usual file
photo, showing him standing alone, makes him look like a
giant of a man. Maybe he is not Goliath afterall?
|
| Posted 21/11/2009 at 6:57 PM | Alert an Editor | Link to comment |
| ALERT US ABOUT THIS COMMENT |
 |
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
|
|
|
|
dogloc l from st kitts, on writes: Its time for the federal government to step in to fix the problem.the federal government will allow the U.S. use a pipeline to get their oil from Alaska through Canada to the U.S.,yet it will not allow Nfld & Lab to export its hydro through Canada to Ontario or the U.S..Not one of the parties NDP,Tories or liberals will bring this out in the house of parliament for fear of losing votes in Quebec.Confederation means we are one country sharing believes & willingness to work together & help each other not bigger provinces bullying the smaller provinces for control over them.
|
| Posted 21/11/2009 at 7:35 PM | Alert an Editor | Link to comment |
| ALERT US ABOUT THIS COMMENT |
 |
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
|
|
|
NOTE
The management of this site emphasizes that it is in no way liable for persons, physical or legal, who are hosted here. Moreover, the managers of this site may not be held liable for errors and omissions that may slip into the information displayed in these reader comments. Everyone who submits a comment should read, understand and agree to the Terms of Usage for this section.
|
|
|
|
|
|