Web Notifications

SaltWire.com would like to send you notifications for breaking news alerts.

Activate notifications?

N.S. couple win appeal in legal dispute over repurchase of lottery home

The Law Courts in Halifax.
The Law Courts in Halifax. - Steve Bruce

STORY CONTINUES BELOW THESE SALTWIRE VIDEOS

Olive Tapenade & Vinho Verde | SaltWire

Watch on YouTube: "Olive Tapenade & Vinho Verde | SaltWire"

The Nova Scotia Court of Appeal says a couple did nothing wrong when they sold their home to a local charity for use as a lottery prize and then bought the home back from the winners at a considerable discount.

Kris and Jacques Martin filed an appeal last year after a Nova Scotia Supreme Court judge ruled in favour of  ALPC Housing Solutions Inc.,  the company that managed the 2014 lottery for the Halifax Transition House Association.

Kris Martin was a director of ALPC, which in August 2013 suggested a home lottery to the association as a way to raise money to expand Bryony House, a Halifax shelter for abused women and their children.

The Martins sold their home at 205 Willowhill Ridge in Waverley to Bryony House for $1,075,000. After the prize was drawn for in November 2014, Kris Martin negotiated the repurchase of the house from the winners one week later for $621,500.

At trial, Justice Richard Coughlan found the Martins had breached their fiduciary duties to ALPC and ordered them to pay the company about $324,000 plus costs and interest.

But in a recent decision, the Appeal Court said the trial judge erred in finding the property was subject to a trust, in finding that Jacques Martin had fiduciary obligations to ALPC and in finding that the repurchase of the property was a corporate opportunity that belonged to the company.

“It is not surprising that a striking difference between the initial sale price and the price for the same property on its repurchase within a short timeframe would draw suspicion,” Justice Linda Lee Oland wrote for the three-judge appellate panel.

“Those few facts could blind an observer from taking into account other relevant facts and context. In this case, a full appreciation of the circumstances and the law shows there has been no wrong committed against ALPC.”

The Appeal Court allowed the appeal and awarded the Martins $66,000 in costs.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT