SaltWire's Ask a Journalist: You have questions, let's find some ...
The latest weather columns and browse beautiful photos from Cindy Day
SaltWire's cartoonists bring heart and humour to the news.
NOW Atlantic: Smart thinking for a changing world
The latest on Nova Scotia's mass shooting
What you need to know about COVID-19: June 3
Visit SaltWire.com for more of the stories you want.
Are they an aquaculture regulator or its staunchest defender?
It’s hard to tell sometimes.
On paper, the responsibilities are clear: the provincial government is, in fact, the chief regulator for the aquaculture industry.
In practice, though, it’s much more.
Our provincial government is certainly an investor in the ocean pen aquaculture business — in a big way. Provincial money has been a linchpin in a number of aquaculture related projects, like the massive aquaculture venture planned for Placentia Bay.
And the support’s more than just money.
When the federal Liberals recently made an election promise to phase out open pen Atlantic salmon farming in British Columbia, the official response from the provincial government was made by Fisheries Minister Gerry Byrne, who told CBC, “Newfoundland and Labrador is a place where much of that salmon production should consider to locate.”
He added, “Now is the time for the Liberal party … to say out loud that from a science point of view that maritime aquaculture in Newfoundland and Labrador is sound and will be continued.”
It’s pretty clear where Byrne stands.
That’s been made even more obvious since the latest massive salmon die-off on the south coast, a crisis that neither the company involved — nor the provincial government — said a word about until tonnes of dead and rotting fish started being pulled from sea cages.
Since then, Byrne has taken to Twitter to criticize scientists raising concerns about the environmental effects of the die-off, and has compared news footage of the cleanup to footage shot by opponents of the seal hunt.
Here’s Byrne’s online defence of that comparison: “Hello. CBC asked me if I saw the pictures taken at the site & what I thought of them. So I answered. I said they looked bad. I didn’t condemn the CBC for showing them. I suggested that people reflect, as with the seal hunt, science is a better resource for conclusions then photos.”
Byrne has taken to Twitter to criticize scientists raising concerns about the environmental effects of the die-off, and has compared news footage of the cleanup to footage shot by opponents of the seal hunt.
And it’s more than just words. Both the province’s Supreme Court and its Court of Appeal found that the provincial minister of environment improperly overruled his staff by giving fast-track approval in the environmental assessment process to a massive fish farming project — a project the provincial government was a key investor in.
Science is a better resource for conclusions than politics, as well.
And this provincial government wants a bigger hand in regulating the oil industry?
You can understand why the province is such a larger supporter of a business that provides employment in parts of the province that desperately need the jobs.
But it’s harder to understand how it can continue to be the dispassionate main overseer of a business it’s deeply in love with.
It’s time for a different level of government to step in to make and administer the rules. At least the federal government wouldn’t be overseeing projects they were also actively promoting, funding and defending.
HAVE YOUR SAY
Want to wade into the debate? Write a letter to the editor and email it to firstname.lastname@example.org
Be sure to include a name, address and daytime telephone number where the author can be contacted.
Letters should be no more than 500 words, to a maximum of 700 words.